Re: [IFWP] "DOT HOME" IS HERE!

>From: Ken Freed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [IFWP] "DOT HOME" IS HERE! >Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 09:28:20 -0600 >This "dot home" spam arrived today. Does anyone know anything about this >".HM" TLD and its legitimacy?. >T

[IFWP] Re: [Random-bits] Network Solutions' Common Name Resolution Protocol

This is cut. Apart from the fact that it's garbage, the site certificates don't work. They have been signed over to research.netsol.com and some browsers will warn you that the issueing computer is not the connected computer. Maybe network solution might want to fix this. regards Joe Baptista

[IFWP] "DOT HOME" IS HERE!

This "dot home" spam arrived today. Does anyone know anything about this ".HM" TLD and its legitimacy?. Thanks. -- ken == >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: "DOT HOME" IS HERE! 15835 >Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2000 12:33:10 -0700 >MIM

[IFWP] Australian Government Proposes Internet Naming Law

On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Michael Sondow wrote: > GOVERNMENT (of Australia) PROPOSES INTERNET NAMING LAW The Sydney Morning Herald of 4 SEP 2000 reports: http://www.smh.com.au/news/0009/04/bizcom/bizcom1.html For a text only version: http://www.smh.com.au/news/0009/04/text/bizcom1.html The referen