Re: [IFWP] Re: ICANN President proposes end to At-Large public elections

2002-03-03 Thread Einar Stefferud
When pray tell did the Govt pay for my piece of the Internet. I do not recall ever getting any funds from them to pay for it. I sure would appreciate getting back my $70,000 spent on Internet stuff over the years. Somehow I expect you are not counting anything spent by non-govt people to

[IFWP] FW: IP: Invitation to Provide Input: U.S. NAS Study on Internet Navigation the Domain Name System

2002-03-03 Thread Richard J. Sexton
(fixed) Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Non-member submission from [Dave Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]] Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2002 13:48:44 -0500 Subject: FW: IP: Invitation to Provide Input: U.S. NAS Study on Internet Navigation the Domain Name System From: Dave Farber [EMAIL

[IFWP] Re: Four more years?

2002-03-03 Thread Jay Fenello
At 2/28/02 02:47 AM, Richard J. Sexton wrote: The problem, Jay as I see it, is this: can ICANN be reformed? I don't think so - not with the people that are in charge of it now. Why are they there then? Ira/the DoC appointed them. Why the DoC? Because in the Inter-agency Domain Name Task force