Bob, we have several issues re membership, including identification, fees,
voting procedures/proxy,nomination/election of at-large directors, and their
relationship to the SO membership,if any,but including geographical
representation. All I'm saying is maybe we should consider approaches at
first from which we can learn. I infer from your remarks and checking out
your site that you have all these answers so I would appreciate any
constructive comments you have to share. What's your suggestion for the
membership model and how will it work?
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Allisat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 1999 10:53 AM
To: George Conrades
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Membership] The People's Republic of ICANN?
George writes:
> Until the PROCESS is better understood so we can open it up with a
> sense that it will scale.
PROCESS, my dear, SCHMOSSES. *We* are the process. I am
*part* of the process, intergral to it's evolution. The
same is true of everyone and anyone who, within civil
limits, chooses to participate. That much you apparently
don't understand about the Internet. Which is almost
everything, unfortunately.
I interpret your statement as follows: "Until we can better
control everything to follow the outcome we deteremine wisest
and that scales in the correct, hierarchical manner." All
actions past and current point to this interpretation.
Bob Allisat
Free Community Network _ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://fcn.net _ http://fcn.net/allisat
http://robin.fcn.net
