very little advertising domestically, for one.
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Marc Schneiders wrote:
> Why does it look as if .US is not very much in demand? Many short
> words are still available.
>
> inject.us
> injection.us
>
> Any ideas why?
>
>
--
Please visit http://www.icannw
I expect that the speculators are seeing less glittering future
profits, and the market is proving that there is no danger in
expanding the number of TLDs.
Also, .US is not all that attractive in the first place.
Cheers...\Stef
At 12:44 AM +0200 4/28/02, Marc Schneiders wrote:
>Why does it lo
Why does it look as if .US is not very much in demand? Many short
words are still available.
inject.us
injection.us
Any ideas why?
.US DOMAIN SPACE
Issue: Internet
The Commerce Department's National Telecommunications and Information
Administration (NTIA), in a notice to be published shortly in the Federal
Register, announced a Notice and a Request for public comment on a draft
statement of work that the department contempla
> http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/usrfc2/dotusrfc2.htm
It is evident, from even a cursory reading of the NTIA's Request for
Comments on its Statement of Work regarding the reorganization of
.US, that the DOC intends, or at least wishes, to place .US under
the aegis and control of ICAN
COMPUTERGRAM INTERNATIONAL: JULY 14 2000
SECTION: INTERNET
+ Bar Association Demands Global Internet Laws
US legal organization the American bar association (ABA) has
called for a global internet commission to build a solid legal
structure for businesses and customers processing e-commerce
tr
> Anybody interested in domain name policy issues should read
> it at:
>
> http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/blileyrsp.htm
>
What a cautionary tale! The Policy-wonks and the Commercial-
wallahs *combined take on the Techno-nerds and fall on their face!
Throughout the doc (and consi
Today the responses of both ICANN and the DoC to Tom Bliley's
became public. The responses of the ICANN do not contain much
new information, but the responses of the DoC do. For the first
time, the NTIA talks about the way it feels about NSI and ICANN.
Anybody interested in domain name policy is
Antony Van Couvering wrote:
>
> Rob Hall from CIRA talked about how the Canadians had
> handled their domain, ...
> You can have a look at the as-yet-unfinished
> CIRA work at http://www.cira.ca.
The CDNCC final document, which is available at
http://www.canarie.ca/cdncc/finalreport.html, is
Tony and all,
Let's face the facts here regarding the .US ccTLD. It is
a blatant attempt
to get a semiprivate corporation a cart blanch at capitalizing on control
of a TLD. This would seem in contrast to what the ICANN has publicly
stated
to not be in favor of. I would wonder how the ICANN v
Antony,
Good summary.
There's a poorly reported article on the .US
ccTLD hearing yesterday at NTIA
at
http://www.wired.com/news/news/politics/story/18371.html.
For one thing,
the Postal Service rep is misidentified (the name he used was on the
agenda,
You might also want to check out Jeri's pie
Hi everyone,
There's a poorly reported article on the .US ccTLD hearing yesterday at NTIA
at http://www.wired.com/news/news/politics/story/18371.html. For one thing,
the Postal Service rep is misidentified (the name he used was on the agenda,
but they switched). The U.S. Postal Service, while i
12 matches
Mail list logo
