[IFWP] Fwd: Re: [names] Consensus on consensus

1999-10-08 Thread Jay Fenello
From the [names] list: Date: Thu, 07 Oct 1999 13:32:05 -0400 To: Becky Burr [EMAIL PROTECTED], "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], Esther Dyson [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED],

[IFWP] Fwd: Re: [names] Consensus on consensus

1999-10-08 Thread Jay Fenello
FYI: Date: Fri, 08 Oct 1999 10:34:05 -0400 To: Becky Burr [EMAIL PROTECTED], "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], Esther Dyson [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [IFWP] Fwd: Re: [names] Consensus on consensus

1999-10-08 Thread Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law
I would like to note for the record that participation does not equal consent in an ad hoc process of this sort. That is especially the case where the process is continually changed (I will not say "manipulated") so the ground rules do not remain consistent. Statements of this sort are in my