On Mon, Nov 15, 1999 at 09:24:46PM -0500, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
> >Yes, indeed. Been there...done that. There have been at least 5
> >serious attempts to create alternate root servers. They all have
> >failed. Why do you suppose that is?
>
> Oh, sure, in the past tense you refer to them as
>Yes, indeed. Been there...done that. There have been at least 5
>serious attempts to create alternate root servers. They all have
>failed. Why do you suppose that is?
Oh, sure, in the past tense you refer to them as "serious" :-)
But to answer your question, a) because of the personalities
On Mon, Nov 15, 1999 at 06:55:35PM -0500, Javier Rodriguez wrote:
> (Keep in mind, when I say "multiple roots", I mean
> >> a small number [5 or so] of mutually-exclusive roots.)
> >
> >What mechanism do you propose to 1) keep it a small number, and 2)
> >ensure that they are mutually-exclusive?
(Keep in mind, when I say "multiple roots", I mean
>> a small number [5 or so] of mutually-exclusive roots.)
>
>What mechanism do you propose to 1) keep it a small number, and 2)
>ensure that they are mutually-exclusive?
Why ?
I want to be free to create ".free" root (4 letters root) ... and 1
