On Fri, 04 Jun 1999 09:32:44 +0100, Jeff Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Mikki and all,
>
> Thank you Mikki for providing this information. And please include me
>as the spokesman for INEGroup in this Constituency. I do have a few
>questions however... Consider this reply as my interest
Bret and all,
Bret A. Fausett wrote:
> >Also, they are soliciting comments by July 4 on whether the WIPO proposals
> >should be 1) broadened to include all commercial disputes...
>
> Please explain.
>
> ICANN is empowered to "set policy for and direct the allocation of IP
> number blocks, overse
At 01:43 PM 6/4/99 -0400, you wrote:
>>Also, they are soliciting comments by July 4 on whether the WIPO proposals
>>should be 1) broadened to include all commercial disputes...
>
>Please explain.
>
>ICANN is empowered to "set policy for and direct the allocation of IP
>number blocks, oversee the
>Also, they are soliciting comments by July 4 on whether the WIPO proposals
>should be 1) broadened to include all commercial disputes...
Please explain.
ICANN is empowered to "set policy for and direct the allocation of IP
number blocks, oversee the operation of the Internet root server syste
Mikki and all,
Thank you Mikki for providing this information. And please include me
as the spokesman for INEGroup in this Constituency. I do have a few
questions however... Consider this reply as my interest in this area...
1.) Is there a membership yet for this constituency?
2.) Will this
DNRC was invited to a conference call of the Intellectual Property
Constituency this morning. At this meeting, it was stated that individuals
and organizations who wished inclusion could be given "observer" status and
have access to conference calls and information regarding what was going on
wit
