Karl Auerbach wrote:
Let people and entities form whatever coalitions they
desire, let them
mutate and reform as conditions change. Let those
coalitions express
their power via the number of individuals that they can
convince to cast
their votes in accord with the coalition's point of v
Eric and all,
Completely agreed. This has been our position regarding the
formation of consitiuencies/colitions. To pre-define them as part of a
Bylaw's structure of the DNSO or ICANN Membership, is as has been
observed by many, devisive and planned gerrymandering. Hence it is
not legal.
Er
>> Let people and entities form whatever coalitions they desire, let them
>> mutate and reform as conditions change. Let those coalitions express
>> their power via the number of individuals that they can convince to
>> cast their votes in accord with the coalition's point of view.
> But, how
Karl Auerbach a écrit:
>
> There seems to have been a major leap in the presumed acceptance
> of the DNSO's concept of pre-defined constituencies.
The Paris draft supporters tried hard to keep pre-formed
constituencies out of the DNSO, but we were unable to in the face of
ICANN bias towards the
