Right. Now I'm catching up. (I lost track of the start of the thread and
presumed you were talking more generally about censorship.)
I see how you've got it listed on your own page, showing the deletions. For
example:
http://www.newdom.com/archive/pab/0923.html
Is Kent still on this list? I don
The Dellheim companies stuff.
At 07:53 AM 5/30/00 -0400, you wrote:
>What's missing?
>
>"Richard J. Sexton" wrote:
>>
>> At 10:50 PM 5/29/00 -0400, you wrote:
>> >Try this for the PAB archives. http://songbird.com/pab/mail/
>>
>> That's where I got them from orginally. They've had some stuff
>>
Something other than this?
http://www.iana.org/comments/comments.htm
Jay Fenello wrote:
>
> At 10:50 PM 5/29/00, Craig Simon wrote:
> >Try this for the PAB archives. http://songbird.com/pab/mail/
> >
> >Which IANA archives don't work?
>
> As far as I can tell, it's [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> It
What's missing?
"Richard J. Sexton" wrote:
>
> At 10:50 PM 5/29/00 -0400, you wrote:
> >Try this for the PAB archives. http://songbird.com/pab/mail/
>
> That's where I got them from orginally. They've had some stuff
> taken out already.
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 10:50 PM 5/29/00, Craig Simon wrote:
>Try this for the PAB archives. http://songbird.com/pab/mail/
>
>Which IANA archives don't work?
As far as I can tell, it's [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It was the list that people were supposed to
use to send comments on the five draft by-laws
that eventually morph
Richard J. Sexton wrote:
>
> >Try this for the PAB archives. http://songbird.com/pab/mail/
>
> That's where I got them from orginally. They've had some stuff
> taken out already.
Naturally. What do you expect from a mailing list run by Kent
Crispin, who rewrote the "dnso.org" proposal in collab
At 10:50 PM 5/29/00 -0400, you wrote:
>Try this for the PAB archives. http://songbird.com/pab/mail/
That's where I got them from orginally. They've had some stuff
taken out already.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ph-1.613.473.1719
It's about travel on expense accoun
Try this for the PAB archives. http://songbird.com/pab/mail/
Which IANA archives don't work?
Craig Simon
Jay Fenello wrote:
>
> At 07:14 PM 5/29/00, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
> >At 06:14 PM 5/29/00 -0400, you wrote:
> > >At 07:53 PM 5/17/00, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
> > >>Doesn't seem that impo
At 07:14 PM 5/29/00, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
>At 06:14 PM 5/29/00 -0400, you wrote:
> >At 07:53 PM 5/17/00, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
> >>Doesn't seem that important. It's not like poeple can't
> >>figure out [deleted] means S.D.Dellheim Companies
> >
> >
> >It's not just the name that
> >is missi
At 06:14 PM 5/29/00 -0400, you wrote:
>At 07:53 PM 5/17/00, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
>>Doesn't seem that important. It's not like poeple can't
>>figure out [deleted] means S.D.Dellheim Companies
>
>
>It's not just the name that
>is missing, is it?
>
>Is there any way to revert
>to the complete arc
At 07:53 PM 5/17/00, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
>Doesn't seem that important. It's not like poeple can't
>figure out [deleted] means S.D.Dellheim Companies
It's not just the name that
is missing, is it?
Is there any way to revert
to the complete archives?
Jay.
>At 04:30 PM 5/17/00 -0700, Roel
ONly people who are reading this list now will know that (Or people
who read enough of the archives to find this thread). Someone just
surfing in at random stands a good chance of NOT knowing and getting
the impression the list isn't a complete reflection of the message s.
Come to think of it, i
ok
At 06:23 PM 5/17/00 -0700, you wrote:
>>Doesn't seem that important. It's not like poeple can't
>>figure out [deleted] means S.D.Dellheim Companies
>
>Not to belabor the point, but Richard, if you do it for one, you may have
>to do it for othersand NO, there's no way for people new to this
>Doesn't seem that important. It's not like poeple can't
>figure out [deleted] means S.D.Dellheim Companies
Not to belabor the point, but Richard, if you do it for one, you may have
to do it for othersand NO, there's no way for people new to this
discussion to have a clue who [deleted] means.
Doesn't seem that important. It's not like poeple can't
figure out [deleted] means S.D.Dellheim Companies
At 04:30 PM 5/17/00 -0700, Roeland Meyer (E-mail) wrote:
>Boy, it's a good thing that I pulled down my own copy .
>
>Not meaning to be too argumentative Richard, but wy did you give
>in and w
15 matches
Mail list logo
