[IFWP] RE: anonymity on this list?

1999-09-08 Thread Ben Edelman
Peter, First of all, you may be unaware, but messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are archived and/or analyzed at a number of sites on the 'net, not just the Berkman Center ICANN-Related Discussion List Statistics page. They're also included in Richard Sexton's archive (I don't have the URL handy

Re: [IFWP] RE: anonymity on this list?

1999-09-08 Thread J. Baptista
Hello: I believe Mr. Mason attempted to address the privacy issue before in this regards. It may prove beneficial Ben if you revisited the argument. Many governmental freedom of information and protection of privacy offices have addressed web related privacy. ICANN archives are by default

Re: [IFWP] RE: anonymity on this list?

1999-09-08 Thread Ellen Rony
Ben Edelman wrote: All that said, I'd be open to comments from the list. If the list consensus really is contrary to my instincts -- if people want an "opt out" policy for the archive -- I'd certainly consider as much, and the operators of other archives might then consider doing the same. I

[Attention becky Burr] to:Re: [IFWP] RE: anonymity on this list?

1999-09-08 Thread Jeff Williams
Joe, Ben and all, Joe is correct here. It has become painfully clear that neither ICANN or the Berkman center in this process have much if any respect for the privacy of any individual. This history is very clear indeed. Such behavior on the part of ICANN and now it seems the Berkman center