[IFWP] RE: well folks - more work for bind2000

1999-11-11 Thread baptista
On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, Mark Jeftovic wrote: It's fixed in 8.2.2PL3. It was already fixed before the advisory was widely released. Why don't you write your own dns resolver Joe, show us how it's done? not my job. that's like asking a software critic to write the program. How rude. Anyway

Re: [IFWP] RE: well folks - more work for bind2000

1999-11-11 Thread Jeff Williams
Joe and all, Well I must admit you have a good point here Joe. Marks request, however much in Jest it may be, is something like asking a software critic to write code. But none the less Mark full well knows that BindPlus (Ours) is already available. He just wants source code which we rarely

[IFWP] Re: well folks - more work for bind2000

1999-11-11 Thread baptista
On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, Craig Avnit wrote: Since when is it vixies job to fix the bugs in BIND, before posting such idiotic messages to the list read the license irrelevant. every single issue of vixies software is buggy. It's terrible. as for my providing fixes - not my department. i'm here

RE: [IFWP] Re: well folks - more work for bind2000

1999-11-11 Thread Mark Jeftovic
On 11-Nov-99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, Craig Avnit wrote: Since when is it vixies job to fix the bugs in BIND, before posting such idiotic messages to the list read the license irrelevant. every single issue of vixies software is buggy. It's terrible. as for my

RE: [IFWP] Re: well folks - more work for bind2000

1999-11-11 Thread baptista
On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, Mark Jeftovic wrote: LMAO :) I think the internet will muddle through without you. You are correct. However, I unlike most do not believe that a system which "muddle's through" is the best - and I am a creature of habit. I demand the best, and second best I leave to

Re: [IFWP] Re: well folks - more work for bind2000

1999-11-11 Thread baptista
you never get it - do you. On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, William X. Walsh wrote: When you contribute productive programming to the internet community, then maybe someone will take your little diatribe seriously. it's not my department ... As it is, it looks to me like you are just doing whatever

RE: [IFWP] Re: well folks - more work for bind2000

1999-11-11 Thread Richard J. Sexton
That's a curious statement. Vixie being the originator of a software daemon that upwards of 90% of internet hosts use to resolve domain names (including Vixie didn't originate it. He's just the current maintainer. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] "I see you've got yout

Re: [IFWP] Re: well folks - more work for bind2000

1999-11-11 Thread Mark C. Langston
On 11 November 1999, "Richard J. Sexton" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's a curious statement. Vixie being the originator of a software daemon that upwards of 90% of internet hosts use to resolve domain names (including Vixie didn't originate it. He's just the current maintainer. ...and,

Re: Re: [IFWP] Re: well folks - more work for bind2000

1999-11-11 Thread baptista
pportunity. Regards Joe - Original Message - From: Joe Baptista [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 11, 1999 5:29 PM Subject: Re: [IFWP] Re: well folks - more work for bind2000 you never get it - do you. On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, William X. Walsh wrote:

Re: [IFWP] Re: well folks - more work for bind2000

1999-11-11 Thread Jeff Williams
PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 11, 1999 5:29 PM Subject: Re: [IFWP] Re: well folks - more work for bind2000 you never get it - do you. On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, William X. Walsh wrote: When you contribute productive programming to the internet