Re: [IFWP] Re: [aso-policy] RE: [aso-comment] IPaddressholders - are they represented?

2000-03-14 Thread Jeff Williams
David and all, David R. Conrad wrote: > Richard, > > > Would I be wrong then in taking your positon to be "IP addresses should > > be managed by a technical process, while domain names should be managed > > by a political process"? > > I do not necessarily feel political processes are the best m

Re: [IFWP] Re: [aso-policy] RE: [aso-comment] IPaddressholders -are they represented?

2000-03-14 Thread !Dr. Joe Baptista
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, David R. Conrad wrote: > I do not necessarily feel political processes are the best mechanism to manage > the DNS, rather I'd say political processes are appropriate for the creation > of the policies by which the DNS is managed. Have you ever heard of the english language

Re: [IFWP] Re: [aso-policy] RE: [aso-comment] IPaddressholders - are they represented?

2000-03-14 Thread Richard J. Sexton
At 10:09 AM 3/14/00 -0800, David R. Conrad wrote: >Richard, > >> Would I be wrong then in taking your positon to be "IP addresses should >> be managed by a technical process, while domain names should be managed >> by a political process"? > >I do not necessarily feel political processes are the b

Re: [IFWP] Re: [aso-policy] RE: [aso-comment] IPaddressholders - are they represented?

2000-03-14 Thread David R. Conrad
Richard, > Would I be wrong then in taking your positon to be "IP addresses should > be managed by a technical process, while domain names should be managed > by a political process"? I do not necessarily feel political processes are the best mechanism to manage the DNS, rather I'd say political