Mr. Gaetano and Everyone, Your question Mr. Gaetano is a very good one. Such a situation should not occur. It seems now that several others that have been involved in these debates, such as myself and Jeff Williams as well are also prevented form posting to the GA DNSO list as well as any other DNSO list. Why is this sort of childish thing occuring and being allowed to continue to occur? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Michael Sondow wrote: > > > > It is not the place for the so-called secretary of the DNSO to be > > deciding, or even commenting on, the voting procedure to be used for > > electing DNSO board members. > > Can somebody explain me why a person that has participated in this debate > since day 1, that is a spokesperson of a ccTLD, loses her right to express > her opinion on DNSO issues when she takes the "so-called" task of secretary > (in fact, I believe list administrator, but this is a minor issue)? > > (another minor issue is whether she would have been entitled to express her > opinion in case she thought that STV is a better method?) > > Regards > Roberto Respectfully, -- Brian C. Hollingsworth Sr. Legal Advisor, International House of Justice Internet Communications Affairs and Policy Advisory council for Public Affairs and Internet Policy, European Union
