Joe and all,
I am sure that the folks at Bull will not be happy with harald in the next
few days, and this is just another example as to why.
Indeed this idea is a bit myopic view, but I guess that some will find it
viable but narrows the field of potential down to a much smaller group,
whic
Well that's the issue here. It's critical that we stop playing games and
get on with the business of establishing the GA. Roberto imposed rules -
so fine - i can live with rules - in fact I live for rules. Of course I
preffer rules that are fair an decent and for the common good. But I can
als
Joe and all,
Those that you mention here, (The four Horse-shitters) don't want
an open or transparent process or membership, just a "Club". That is fine
I suppose, but hardly representative of anything legitimately
!Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
> I'm cross posting this to make sure other memb
I'm cross posting this to make sure other members of the community can
follow this insanity.
I and Walsh agree that for the GA@DNSO to get any works of substance done,
it is critical that we meet the chairs and NC's definition of real
person. Yes - the chair and alternate have avoided this issu
William - congratulation we agree. This must me an internet first.
On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, William X. Walsh wrote:
> I again renew my call that all members of the GA list must validate by some
> form of identification, such as a govt. issued ID.
I completely agree. I for one am more then willin
