Mark and all,
I have the same concern regarding Dr. Nii N. Quaynor myself.
He on two occasions tried to register two different organizations
as constituent members of the NCDNHC (See NCDNHC
mailing list archives for more info). I find both his nomination and
exceptence extreamly circumspect.
I have no issue with Quaynor's nomination. I am concerned that he not
allow himself ever to be bullied by the lawyers. The IDNO/ICANN scandal
in Santiago in which he lost control is the reference I'm reffering to.
Cheers
Joe Baptista
On Fri, 17 Sep 1999, Alejandro Pisanty, DGSCA y FQ, UNAM
Joe and all,
Yes indeed, another good reason for opposing Nii's nomination
as well.
J. Baptista wrote:
I have no issue with Quaynor's nomination. I am concerned that he not
allow himself ever to be bullied by the lawyers. The IDNO/ICANN scandal
in Santiago in which he lost control is
Dr. Nii N. Quaynor and all,
You meger attempt to side step the issue at hand or dismiss it
out of hand is noc sufficently convencing IMHO, nor do I doubt,
that after a review of the NCDNHC archives, will it be by
any ressonable person orGA member either.
Dr. Nii N. Quaynor wrote:
I have
On Fri, 17 Sep 1999, Dr. Nii N. Quaynor wrote:
I have no issue with Quaynor's nomination. I am concerned that he not
allow himself ever to be bullied by the lawyers. The IDNO/ICANN scandal
in Santiago in which he lost control is the reference I'm reffering to.
The challenge of the
On Fri, 17 Sep 1999, Jeff Williams wrote:
Joe and all,
Yes indeed, another good reason for opposing Nii's nomination
as well.
I'm not opposed to him. I'm just wanted to address that specific issue
and move on.
J. Baptista wrote:
I have no issue with Quaynor's nomination. I am
Oh no, I'm very grateful for what you did. As for the lawyers behaviour,
i'm not that impressed.
Good luck to you on the election. You can count on our support.
Cheers
Joe Baptista
On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, Dr. Nii N. Quaynor wrote:
Hi Joe,
I will appreciate your support note independently.
I completely understand the pressures you were under. I was annoyed by
the fact a decision was reached by the assembly, and under Robert's that
should have been it, as respect the IDNO vote. But the lawyers forced the
chair to reconsider the motion made and voted on. The scandal is the fact
it
On Fri, 17 Sep 1999, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
I completely understand the pressures you were under. I was annoyed by
the fact a decision was reached by the assembly, and under Robert's that
should have been it, as respect the IDNO vote. But the lawyers forced the
chair to reconsider the
Dr. Nii N. Quaynor and all,
You use of the term "Grateful" in respect to the IDNO being recognized
as a constituency is absurd here. I hope you will retract that comment
with the use of the term of "Grateful".
Whether or not Lawyers are part of the GA is not in question. I
support and
10 matches
Mail list logo
