15, 1999 7:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Ken Stubbs; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IFWP] Re: California meeting March 18; was Re: Chopped
liver no more!
Ken Stubbs wrote:
why don't you work on substantive issues rather than trying to make a
mountain out of an anthill..
Interesting
Stubbs; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IFWP] Re: California meeting March 18; was Re: Chopped
liver no more!
Ken Stubbs wrote:
why don't you work on substantive issues rather than trying to make a
mountain out of an anthill..
Interesting tactic. Discredit both the question
Esther Dyson wrote:
Ellen, yes, it was an accident. WHy on earth should we conspire against
California?
Well, since you asked, I have speculated on this very question. California
is (a) the largest state in the nation; (b) the home of Silicon Valley
with arguably the largest concentration of
--Original Message-
From: Ellen Rony [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Esther Dyson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, February 15, 1999 3:53 PM
Subject: [IFWP] Re:
So why not meet here in Denver?
We're convenient from both coasts,
equidistant from Europe and Asia,
relatively neutral turf (cable aside),
our climate can't be beat, and we
offer excellent meeting facilities.
I could help with logistics.
-- Ken
Ken Freed
Media Visions
Denver
Esther Dyson
What kind of meeting is this expected to be?
Does it have an agenda? Is it just a social gathering?
Or a Birds Of A Feather thing?
Or just a meeting to enable saying that ICANN held one in California?
Seriously, we should have more of an idea about why and what.
Cheers...\Stef
Einar Stefferud wrote:
What kind of meeting is this expected to be?
Does it have an agenda? Is it just a social gathering?
Well, I can't speak for anyone else, but since the Singapore meeting will
be over, and since ICANN has not included on its agenda a discussion about
whether to open board
