Richard and all,
Interesting observations here Richard. We [INEGroup] share some of
them
with you and some with Jay as well. However there are some differences
that we saw as significant that were not allowed to surface in
Singapore that concerns us greatly. (See below for more comments)...
Jay,
I read with interest your report.
Let me point out the couple of points where I don't share your POV.
You wrote:
> Things really got interesting the next day at the open
> ICANN Board meeting. What started out as a presentation
> of the CENTR compromise proposal, quickly devolve
Roberto and all,
Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> Jay,
>
> I read with interest your report.
> Let me point out the couple of points where I don't share your POV.
>
> You wrote:
>
>
>
> > Things really got interesting the next day at the open
> > ICANN Board meeting. What started out as a pres
On 09-Mar-99 jeff Williams wrote:
> Much improvement is needed on the part of the ICANN in this regard,
> was what our [INEGroup], representative, Brian Hollingsworth has
> reported back to us from Singapore.
Representing a non-existant corporation is an interesting job for Mr
Hollingsworth.
At 3:33 PM -0800 3/9/99, William X. Walsh wrote:
>P.S. Now, we all know what Jeff will do in response to this message,
>don't we?
> I'll lay odds the message about me will come within 45 minutes. Anyone want
>to lay odds?
Here, I'll save him and you the trouble.
Jeff will say:
"What about you
All,
Unfortunately Mr. Walsh is mistaken ins his wild assertions, as has been
well documented in the past and is well known to the DOC as well.
But than again given his problems in the recent past with the ccTLD
registry .TJ it is not suprising to us that such rantings that he spews
forth are f
Bingo! That was quick Jeff. :)
You are so very predictable after all this time.
On 09-Mar-99 jeff Williams wrote:
> All,
>
>Unfortunately Mr. Walsh is mistaken ins his wild assertions, as has been
> well documented in the past and is well known to the DOC as well.
> But than aga
On 09-Mar-99 Mark Jeftovic wrote:
>
> On 09-Mar-99 William X. Walsh wrote:
> > On 09-Mar-99 jeff Williams wrote:
> >> Much improvement is needed on the part of the ICANN in this regard,
> >> was what our [INEGroup], representative, Brian Hollingsworth has
> >> reported back to us from Singa
Mark,
And what fee might that be?
Mark Jeftovic wrote:
> On 09-Mar-99 William X. Walsh wrote:
> > On 09-Mar-99 jeff Williams wrote:
> >> Much improvement is needed on the part of the ICANN in this regard,
> >> was what our [INEGroup], representative, Brian Hollingsworth has
> >> reported b
On 10-Mar-99 Mark Jeftovic wrote:
> > Actually, INEG.com was registered by someone else, not Jeff or his
> > fictional
> > company. They let it lapse and now the owner of ineg.net has picked it up.
> >
> > I keep hoping they will do something interesting with it :).
> >
>
> This is the old
Roberto Gaetano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> responding to
>Jay Fenello who wrote:
>Let me point out the couple of points where I don't share your POV.
>You wrote:
>
>> Things really got interesting the next day at the open
>> ICANN Board meeting. What started out as a presentation
>> of the
Ronda Hauben wrote:
>This gives the sense that these are delegates of the Internet
>community. They are *not*. The Internet community is being
>disenfranchised by the whole process of the ICANN which is
>in itself an unauthoritized activity of the U.S. government
>acting outside of any legitimat
"Bret A. Fausett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> responding:
>Ronda Hauben wrote:
>>This gives the sense that these are delegates of the Internet
>>community. They are *not*. The Internet community is being
>>disenfranchised by the whole process of the ICANN which is
>>in itself an unauthoritized activit
On 10-Mar-99 Ronda Hauben wrote:
> This gives the sense that these are delegates of the Internet
> community. They are *not*. The Internet community is being
> disenfranchised by the whole process of the ICANN which is
> in itself an unauthoritized activity of the U.S. government
> acting
On 10-Mar-99 Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> This became clear upon comments made by ICANN Board
> member Hans Kraaijenbrink, who upon further questions from
> Fay Howard of CENTR, revealed his affiliation to BMW
> supporters.
>
> People that were not there could get the wr
At 11:15 AM 3/10/99 -0800, William X. Walsh wrote:
>
>On 10-Mar-99 Ronda Hauben wrote:
>> This gives the sense that these are delegates of the Internet
>> community. They are *not*. The Internet community is being
>> disenfranchised by the whole process of the ICANN which is
>> in itself an
16 matches
Mail list logo
