On Sun, 21 Nov 1999, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
> At 03:02 PM 11/20/99 -0800, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
> >On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Richard J. Sexton (At work) wrote:
> >
> >> Doesn't matter. At least we have COMPETITION in the domain registration
> >> business. You're NO LONGER LOCKED IN and the STABIL
On Sun, 21 Nov 1999, Kent Crispin wrote:
> > What can we conclude from this, class ?
>
> Premise: Having many companies doesn't help service.
>
> Conclusion 1: Competition doesn't work.
>
> Conclusion 2: Multiple competing registries won't help service.
I see you picked your brain up at the
Kent and all,
Kent's logic is again as usual, flawed. His conclusion doesn't follow.
We DON'T have competing REGISTRIES. What we have is
multiple REGISTRARS, with only one Registry. Hence his logic flaw.
Kent Crispin wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 1999 at 07:39:34PM -0500, Richard J. Sexton wrot
On Sun, Nov 21, 1999 at 07:39:34PM -0500, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
> At 03:02 PM 11/20/99 -0800, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
> >On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Richard J. Sexton (At work) wrote:
> >
> >> Doesn't matter. At least we have COMPETITION in the domain registration
> >> business. You're NO LONGER LOCK
Patrick Greenwell wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Richard J. Sexton (At work) wrote:
>
> > Doesn't matter. At least we have COMPETITION in the domain registration
> > business. You're NO LONGER LOCKED IN and the STABILITY OF THE
> > INTERNET is no longer at risk.
> >
> > The fact your domain dosn
At 03:02 PM 11/20/99 -0800, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
>On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Richard J. Sexton (At work) wrote:
>
>> Doesn't matter. At least we have COMPETITION in the domain registration
>> business. You're NO LONGER LOCKED IN and the STABILITY OF THE
>> INTERNET is no longer at risk.
>>
>> The f
Patrick and all,
Well just for starters, NSI's Domains worked.
Patrick Greenwell wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Richard J. Sexton (At work) wrote:
>
> > Doesn't matter. At least we have COMPETITION in the domain registration
> > business. You're NO LONGER LOCKED IN and the STABILITY OF THE
> >
On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Richard J. Sexton (At work) wrote:
> Doesn't matter. At least we have COMPETITION in the domain registration
> business. You're NO LONGER LOCKED IN and the STABILITY OF THE
> INTERNET is no longer at risk.
>
> The fact your domain dosn't work is a small price to pay.
How is
Joe and all,
Yes indeed it does appear that you may be correct in that the DNSO
GA list is selectively censored or the DNSO list admin has some problems
with maintaining the DNSO GA list correctly. Again, although I have contacted
the DNSO list admin, Becky Burr, and Esther Dyson regarding th
no - i am getting mail from the ga - but i can't post to it. however the
listadmin allowed you to post.
--
J. Baptista Planet Communications & Computing Facility
Voice/Fax (212) 894-3704 ext. 1033
http://ww
It looks to me like your message was broadcast to the ga list. However my
reply was not. The listadmin now only allows what she see as fit for
publication.
--
J. Baptista Planet Communications & Computing Facility
Voice/Fax (212) 894-3704 ext.
On Mon, 4 Oct 1999, J. Baptista wrote:
>
> Monday, October 4
>
> INTERNET ANALYST ESTHER DYSON CONSIDERS THE FUTURE OF E-COMMERCE
> (Source: InfoWorld Electric) Although she did not invent the Internet,
> her incisive insights over the years have made her a poster-child for
> the digital c
On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, Planet Communications Computing Facility wrote:
> Hello:
>
> With respect to esther dyson - chairman of the icann board. I've noticed
> that few people address their concerns to the pres mike roberts, instead
> all concerns are directed to the chairman esther dyson - why is
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-Authentication-Warning: opsmail.internic.net: majordom set sender to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randy Bush), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (namedroppers),
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jun Murai), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (junsec),
>
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-Authentication-Warning: opsmail.internic.net: majordom set sender to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: your mail
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randy Bush)
>Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 08:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (namedropp
On Wed, 17 Feb 1999, Ivan Pope wrote:
> My response to the ICANN Draft Accreditation Guidelines for Registrars is at
> http://www.c-change.net
> I would welcome your comments on it. I'm still working on it, but I hope it
A lot of the areas still appear blank.
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
16 matches
Mail list logo
