Re: [IFWP] dot .pn

2000-02-16 Thread Jeff Williams
Joe and all, Yeah it looks pretty, but kinda cheap and yes put together rather quickly. Maybe it will get better with some time and some expertise. It loads slow though. But this isn't what I was eluding to... !Dr. Joe Baptist wrote: > at least the web site http://www.nic.pn/ is pretty -

[IFWP] dot .pn

2000-02-16 Thread !Dr. Joe Baptista
at least the web site http://www.nic.pn/ is pretty - looks like it was put together in a hurry - but it's pretty. regards joe On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, Jeff Williams wrote: > Richard and all, > > I would suggest a much closer checking on this.. .PN is hosted by 2day.com. > > I will leave right t

Re: [IFWP] dot .pn

2000-02-16 Thread Jeff Williams
Richard and all, I would suggest a much closer checking on this.. .PN is hosted by 2day.com. I will leave right there. Check out their services form there and than compare one of those services with the current discussion "Membership consideration" for the DNSO and the tacd.org info Joe poste

Re: [IFWP] dot .pn

2000-02-15 Thread !Dr. Joe Baptista
i don't think the cctld's are very happy - it looks all cat and mouse to me. On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, Richard J. Sexton wrote: > At 02:31 AM 2/16/00 -0500, you wrote: > > > >I am under the impression that by swtiching dot.pn over to the islanders > >is going to cause a bit of a problem for ICANN - h

Re: [IFWP] dot .pn

2000-02-15 Thread Richard J. Sexton
At 02:31 AM 2/16/00 -0500, you wrote: > >I am under the impression that by swtiching dot.pn over to the islanders >is going to cause a bit of a problem for ICANN - have not the cctld >operators formed a pack - if one goes - the whole lot walks. You're saying there'll be a mutiny ? -- [EMAIL PR

[IFWP] dot .pn

2000-02-15 Thread !Dr. Joe Baptista
I am under the impression that by swtiching dot.pn over to the islanders is going to cause a bit of a problem for ICANN - have not the cctld operators formed a pack - if one goes - the whole lot walks. Cairo should be entertaining. Regards Joe Baptista