Joe and all,
Yeah it looks pretty, but kinda cheap and yes put together rather quickly.
Maybe it will get better with some time and some expertise. It loads
slow though.
But this isn't what I was eluding to...
!Dr. Joe Baptist wrote:
> at least the web site http://www.nic.pn/ is pretty -
at least the web site http://www.nic.pn/ is pretty - looks like it was put
together in a hurry - but it's pretty.
regards
joe
On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, Jeff Williams wrote:
> Richard and all,
>
> I would suggest a much closer checking on this.. .PN is hosted by 2day.com.
>
> I will leave right t
Richard and all,
I would suggest a much closer checking on this.. .PN is hosted by 2day.com.
I will leave right there. Check out their services form there and than
compare
one of those services with the current discussion "Membership consideration"
for the DNSO and the tacd.org info Joe poste
i don't think the cctld's are very happy - it looks all cat and mouse to
me.
On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
> At 02:31 AM 2/16/00 -0500, you wrote:
> >
> >I am under the impression that by swtiching dot.pn over to the islanders
> >is going to cause a bit of a problem for ICANN - h
At 02:31 AM 2/16/00 -0500, you wrote:
>
>I am under the impression that by swtiching dot.pn over to the islanders
>is going to cause a bit of a problem for ICANN - have not the cctld
>operators formed a pack - if one goes - the whole lot walks.
You're saying there'll be a mutiny ?
--
[EMAIL PR
I am under the impression that by swtiching dot.pn over to the islanders
is going to cause a bit of a problem for ICANN - have not the cctld
operators formed a pack - if one goes - the whole lot walks.
Cairo should be entertaining.
Regards
Joe Baptista