Thats the point - we do not know.
I say we try it, and get some real world data. If it turns out it
works we can delpoy it on a more widespread basis.
I echo PDT's sentiments though... no "cybersquatter" has ever won
in court and the benefits do not outweightthe burdon.
At 07:03 PM 5/29/99 -04
Process issues aside, and assuming we can fix the (serious) glitches
(timetable, free expression protection), isn't this proposal better than
the NSI dispute policy. (I mean just chapter 3, not chapter 4).
On Sat, 29 May 1999, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
> Have we fogotten that it was a consensus
Jeri Clausing of the New York Times wrote:
> perhaps this is another argument for open meetings? : )
I applaud you, Jeri, for supporting the call for open meetings.
As one who tried to participate remotely in the pre-meeting forum, I was
distressed that messages regarding WIPO that focused on
Have we fogotten that it was a consensus item that a unifom ADR is not desirable
art the Geneva IFWP meeting?
Didd anybody else notice that nobody ever asked the question this time round
"is a uniform ADR desirable"
At 10:32 AM 5/29/99 -0400, Esther Dyson wrote:
>Jeri -
>
>In our conversat
Jeri Clausing wrote:
>my apologies to both of you for any confusion. perhaps this is another
>argument for open meetings? : )
Bingo.
-- Bret
; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Dave Farber
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Saturday, May 29, 1999 10:37 AM
Subject: [IFWP] feedback on NYT article
>Jeri -
>
>In our conversation on Thursday, I said to you that we had endorsed many of
>the "principles" of the W
Jeri -
In our conversation on Thursday, I said to you that we had endorsed many of
the "principles" of the WIPO report, most notably uniform dispute
resolution, but not the specific recomemendations.
I suggested that you consult the press release and resolutions for
details, which include s
