Re: [IFWP] latest ICANN pronouncement

1999-05-25 Thread A.M. Rutkowski
Craig, For ICANN to work, it needs to acquire the kind of legitimacy which ANSI and ISO enjoy. That is, recognition by all (okay, almost all) parties involved, based on widespread confidence that it can impartially carry out its work in the public interest. There is more than one kind of

Re: [IFWP] latest ICANN pronouncement

1999-05-25 Thread Dave Crocker
At 09:29 AM 5/25/99 -0400, A.M. Rutkowski wrote: It's worth noting, however, that as to your own preference of organizational constructs, the bodies you reference have stridently opposed the Internet's development over many years - Well, is certainly would be constructive to pursue this line of

[IFWP] latest ICANN pronouncement

1999-05-24 Thread A.M. Rutkowski
Someone should let the new ICANN-IANA know that their statement: "...a table known as ISO-3166-1, which is maintained by an agency of the United Nations." is not accurate. The Organization for International Standardization (ISO) is a private standards organization. It does make a

Re: [IFWP] latest ICANN pronouncement

1999-05-24 Thread Dave Crocker
Tony, Is there some limitation to your communication capabilities that prevents YOU from contacting those folks? Or, perhaps, were you more interesting in making a public stink than in getting this minor documentation detail corrected? It does make a difference. d/ At 01:03 PM 5/24/99