On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, Ronda Hauben wrote:
> ICANN is illegal and the U.S. government's effort to create
> ICANN is unconstitutional.
>
> Is the Government Corporate Control Act law online? If so where?
All US statutes are online in many places. I like the search form at
http://www.findlaw.com/
"Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ronda Hauben wrote:
ICANN is illegal and the U.S. government's effort to create
ICANN is unconstitutional.
Is the Government Corporate Control Act law online? If so where?
I will take a look at your article when I get the ch
Michael and all,
Interesting how that woks out isn't it? B. Burr counsels the
formation of the GAC, and than automatically sits on it. Kinda
sounds allot like self serving fix, doesn't it? Maybe I am paranoid?
ROFLMAO!
And the divisiveness continues
Michael Sondow wrote:
> Michael F
Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law a écrit:
>
> You will note there that most of the corporations the GCCA aimed to squash
> were formed by US government employees and owned in whole or part by the
> USG. ICANN is different: no USG employees formed it
Not strictly speaking true. B. Burr si
An article on US federal government corporations appears at
http://www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin/articles/reinvent.htm
You will note there that most of the corporations the GCCA aimed to squash
were formed by US government employees and owned in whole or part by the
USG. ICANN is different: no USG
"A.M. Rutkowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Which reminds me - are there any historical examples where
>an entity playing a quasi-governmental role like ICANN has
>ever displayed such amazing behavior as we've witnessed over
>the past couple of weeks - and whether it doesn't essentially
>disenf
