Gene Marsh wrote:
Then there was CLEARLY no consensus at Berlin for any topic I
witnessed,
except in favor of the IDNO.
Obviously we were at different meetings ;).
At the one I attended (non-com constituency, with participation of to-be
individual constituency), even a straw poll was
At 04:06 PM 8/9/99 +0200, you wrote:
Joop,
You wrote:
Thanks for aiding my memory, Roberto.
But if applause indicates consensus, then we also have consensus on
admitting the IDNO constituency to the DNSO.
Unfortunately, applause by itself does not indicate consensus.
A large majority
At 01:59 PM 9/08/1999 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The subject of the testbed, and the poor management thereof by NSI,
triggered again the debate on the gTLD Constituency. I believe that it was
George Conrades to mention that, if NSI was not willing to autolimit their
participation to the
At 04:06 PM 9/08/1999 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joop,
You wrote:
Thanks for aiding my memory, Roberto.
But if applause indicates consensus, then we also have consensus on
admitting the IDNO constituency to the DNSO.
Unfortunately, applause by itself does not indicate consensus.
A
