All,
It seems that William X. Walsh is yet again up to his usual antics
of making fals aspersions against others.
It appears that his stated activities recently "Vactation", are
not helping him much. Possibly an extended stay at one the local
mental institutions would be more appropriate.
On Sat, 01 May 1999 12:09:48 -0400, Michael Sondow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I am removing your name from the list of sign-ups through the ICIIU
>procedure. The ICIIU is under no obligation to assist you in joining
>the NCDNHC when you are spreading lies about us. You can join the
>constituency
Michael Sondow wrote:
> John B. Reynolds a écrit:
>
> > This is am unfortunate but entirely predictable consequence of
> allowing the
> > initial constituencies to "self-organize" - easily the worst Paris Draft
> > provision to have found its way into the final DNSO structure. In the
> > absenc
At 12:20 PM 5/1/99 -0400, you wrote:
>Richard J. Sexton a écrit:
>
>> I have to agree. There are only three constituencies: technical, legal
>> and administrative. Anything else in gerrymandering at worst and
>> a self selected autocracy at best.
>
>I'm very surprised to see you agreeing with John
Richard J. Sexton a écrit:
> I have to agree. There are only three constituencies: technical, legal
> and administrative. Anything else in gerrymandering at worst and
> a self selected autocracy at best.
I'm very surprised to see you agreeing with John Reynolds'
misinformation. While you have a
John B. Reynolds a écrit:
> This is am unfortunate but entirely predictable consequence of allowing the
> initial constituencies to "self-organize" - easily the worst Paris Draft
> provision to have found its way into the final DNSO structure. In the
> absence of explicit, non-ambiguous eligibil
Bret A. Fausett wrote:
>
> ICANN's "Domain Name Supporting Organization Formation Concepts"
> Statement contains a provision which reads: "Individual domain name
> holders should be able to participate in constituencies for which they
> qualify."
>
> Depending on the decisions ICANN makes in appro
>> For reference, ICANN's "DNSO Formation Concepts" is at:
>> http://www.icann.org/dnso-formation.html
>>
>> Links to current constituency drafts are at:
>> http://www.icann.org/dnso/constituency_groups.html
>>
>
>This is am unfortunate but entirely predictable consequence of allowing the
>initial
Bret and all,
Yes you are mistaken Bret. The very reference by definition
of the
current "Constituencies" are in and of themselves exclusionary
to one degree or another or in some fashion of another. This
is
the very nature of what a "Constituency" is, for heavens sake!!
And as such it is exa
Bret A. Fausett a écrit:
>
> ICANN's "Domain Name Supporting Organization Formation Concepts"
> Statement contains a provision which reads: "Individual domain name
> holders should be able to participate in constituencies for which they
> qualify."
>
> Depending on the decisions ICANN makes in a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brad,
Individuals will certainly be welcome associates within the TLDA
organization. Sorry, I cannot address the policy of any of the other
constituancies.
Gene Marsh
- -Original Message-
From: Bret A. Fausett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Se
11 matches
Mail list logo
