Re: [IFWP] Goose and gander

1999-05-31 Thread Jeff Williams
Richard and all, Yes it is funny and curious to boot that Esther in particular in this instance and the ICANN Interim Board to a lesser degree are ignorant to the actual facts in existence. It shows to a great degree that they are incompetent and irresponsible in their charge. I wonder how

RE: [IFWP] Goose and gander

1999-05-31 Thread Marsh, Miles (Gene)
Title: RE: [IFWP] Goose and gander I need only point out the conversations and results from Berlin.  NSI successfully (in conjunction with ICANN attorneys) argued that NSI is the ONLY group with a right to gTLD recognition in the gTLD DNSO constituency effort. Gene... > -Origi

Re: [IFWP] Goose and gander

1999-05-31 Thread Richard J. Sexton
At 08:38 PM 5/31/99 -0400, you wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > > "The spirit of the actions taken in Berlin were > contrary to the sprit of the white paper--that > decisions be consensus based and bottom up. > T

Re: [IFWP] Goose and gander

1999-05-31 Thread William X. Walsh
On Mon, 31 May 1999 20:38:29 -0400, "Marsh, Miles (Gene)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > > "The spirit of the actions taken in Berlin were > contrary to the sprit of the white paper--that > decisions be co