Hi.
Richard Sexton wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say this is a pretty clear determination of the effects NSI's
prepayment requirement is going to have on its new and future
prospective registrars.
Where were you 6 months ago when it seemed like I was the only one on
[EMAIL
On Wed, 9 Jun 1999 09:34:30 +0200 , Roberto Gaetano
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
Richard Sexton wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say this is a pretty clear determination of the effects NSI's
prepayment requirement is going to have on its new and future
prospective registrars.
The big issue, as I see it, is not "prepayment yes" vs. "prepayment no",
but "prepayment yes for some and no for others".
It is self-evident (please correct me if I'm wrong) that this situation is
not a level field for competition.
More like this should not be an issue imposed by the
Roberto and all,
Roberto Gaetano wrote:
Hi.
Richard Sexton wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say this is a pretty clear determination of the effects NSI's
prepayment requirement is going to have on its new and future
prospective registrars.
Where were you 6 months ago
On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
Hi.
Richard Sexton wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say this is a pretty clear determination of the effects NSI's
prepayment requirement is going to have on its new and future
prospective registrars.
Where were you 6 months ago
I'd say this is a pretty clear determination of the effects NSI's
prepayment requirement is going to have on its new and future
prospective registrars.
Where were you 6 months ago when it seemed like I was the only one on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] advocating no prepayment???
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 8 Jun 1999 17:57:55 -0400 (EDT), "Richard J. Sexton"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say this is a pretty clear determination of the effects NSI's
prepayment requirement is going to have on its new and future
prospective registrars.
Where were you 6 months ago when it seemed like I was the
