RE: Draft comparison

Ellen, You wrote: > Einar Stefferud wrote: > >I stongly agree that you should keep all drafts for the historical > >record to prevent further rewriting of DNSO history! > > I'm pleased that you find these comparisons so useful. > Once again, an outstanding job. > The two proposals that have b

Re: Draft comparison

In message , Ellen Rony writes: > The two proposals that have been submitted to ICANN (DNSO.ORG of 2/5 and > Paris Draft of 2/4) are now posted at www.domainhandbook.com/comp-dnso.html > Earlier draft versions are posted at > www.domainhandbook.com/comp-dn

Re: Draft comparison

Einar Stefferud wrote: >I stongly agree that you should keep all drafts for the historical >record to prevent further rewriting of DNSO history! I'm pleased that you find these comparisons so useful. The two proposals that have been submitted to ICANN (DNSO.ORG of 2/5 and Paris Draft of 2/4) are

Re: Draft comparison

I stongly agree that you should keep all drafts for the historical record to prevent further rewriting of DNSO history! Cheers...\Stef >From your message Sat, 06 Feb 1999 08:37:59 +0200: } }Ellen, } }Please, under *NO CIRCUMSTANCES* take down the five drafts of the }comparative Web Page. } }If