RE: Useful Comments Re: DNSO process and Drafts submitted to ICA

1999-02-08 Thread William X. Walsh
On 08-Feb-99 David Schutt wrote: > Not a good example, my browser timed out. Yeah, a free service sometimes has Hiccups. > There are lots of experimental and/or educational systems out there, I'm > more interested in commercial services that can take a spike without > gasping. I believe

RE: Useful Comments Re: DNSO process and Drafts submitted to ICA

1999-02-08 Thread David Schutt
OTECTED]]On Behalf Of > William X. Walsh > Sent: Sunday, February 07, 1999 11:02 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: DNSO; DNSO; Domain-Policy@Open-Rsc. Org; John B. Reynolds > Subject: Re: Useful Comments Re: DNSO process and Drafts submitted to > ICA > > > Yes they do!

Re: Useful Comments Re: DNSO process and Drafts submitted to ICA

1999-02-08 Thread William X. Walsh
First of all, can we lose the confrontational tones? On 08-Feb-99 Michael Sondow wrote: > John B. Reynolds a écrit: > > > You administer your zone indirectly by controlling which ISP runs it > > directly. > > Administer the zone indirectly? What are you talking about? Is this a game > of

Re: Useful Comments Re: DNSO process and Drafts submitted to ICA

1999-02-07 Thread William X. Walsh
On 08-Feb-99 Michael Sondow wrote: > John B. Reynolds a écrit: > > > How would this give control to ORSC? > > Alright, perhaps my reaction was slightly exaggerated. Let's just say it's > strictly in their interest, to the direct detriment of other interests, my > own for example. I fai