Re: [pfSense] Compex WLM54SAGP23 (Atheros 5413), ALIX 2D3 pfSense 2?

2012-04-27 Thread bsd
Le 26 avr. 2012 à 21:40, Pete Boyd a écrit : Hi. I'm choosing a miniPCI wireless card from www.msdist.co.uk to go in an ALIX 2D3. The only cards there that appear to be supported by FreeBSD 8.1 are the Wistron DCMA81 (Atheros AR5213A), Wistron CM9-GP (Atheros AR5213A) and the Compex

Re: [pfSense] Compex WLM54SAGP23 (Atheros 5413), ALIX 2D3 pfSense 2?

2012-04-27 Thread Pete Boyd
On 27/04/12 11:00, bsd wrote: I've been using the above miniPCI card in an Alix board for over a year now - entirely trouble free. Great. Thanks. -- Pete Boyd thegoldenear.org openplanit.co.uk ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org

[pfSense] defuncts related to tinydns

2012-04-27 Thread Ray
Hi there, when I fire up svscan on one of my pfsense 2.0.1 boxes, it starts supervise tinydns processes. These supervise processes spawn plenty of processes that end up as zombies, each of which dies some seconds. I.e., I have a block of 5-6 defeuncts traversing my process list. Constantly.

[pfSense] incoming load balancer docs notes

2012-04-27 Thread Vick Khera
Reading http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Inbound_Load_Balancing I find a couple of issues, which seem to be changes in 2.0. 1) the default probe is 10 seconds, not 5. There is no way to tweak that. 2) there is no sticky option The commentary about 1.2 implementation using NAT and issues with

Re: [pfSense] [pfsense] dansguardian

2012-04-27 Thread k_o_l
Ryan, your solution worked just fine, but in addition I added a fw rule to catch all http (port 80) traffic and had it redirected to 8080, that way you don't need to change the proxy on the individual hosts From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf

Re: [pfSense] incoming load balancer docs notes

2012-04-27 Thread Jim Pingle
On 4/27/2012 11:44 AM, Vick Khera wrote: Reading http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Inbound_Load_Balancing I find a couple of issues, which seem to be changes in 2.0. 1) the default probe is 10 seconds, not 5. There is no way to tweak that. There is in 2.1 2) there is no sticky option

Re: [pfSense] [pfsense] dansguardian

2012-04-27 Thread Ryan Rodrigue
Ryan, your solution worked just fine, but in addition I added a fw rule to catch all http (port 80) traffic and had it redirected to 8080, that way you don't need to change the proxy on the individual hosts K_o_l How and where did you add such a rule? I would like it to work in

Re: [pfSense] [pfsense] dansguardian

2012-04-27 Thread k_o_l
Firewall: NAT: Port Forward: Interface: LAN Protocol: TCP Destination: ANY Destination port range: from http to http Redirect target ip: 127.0.0.1 Redirect target port : other 8080 Make sure it showing under the LAN segment in the correct order From: Ryan Rodrigue

Re: [pfSense] Packages are being installed in the background (pfSense 2.0.1)

2012-04-27 Thread Volker Kuhlmann
On Fri 24 Feb 2012 21:45:15 NZDT +1300, Jürgen Echter wrote: i had to re-setup my firewall and restored my config. all went well so far, but i can't edit anything because i have on every screen a pic which says 'packages are being reinstalled in the background'. this is on since a few hours.

Re: [pfSense] pfsense/shell ipsec behavior

2012-04-27 Thread Uttam Singh
OK - figured this part out. I needed to use ping -S source ip-address... when pinging a ipsec-network host from the pf device itself. Any ideas on how to make this work for iperf in client mode? Is there any way to specify a default System IP Address? I see that a Virtual IP can only be