I have posted this on forum please write you suggestion on there...! Link
bellow:
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,49043.msg259653.html#msg259653
On 3 May 2012 08:44, Abdullah Nihan abd@gmail.com wrote:
Espen thanks for your reply, that's correct I want I want to use Vlan10 to
be
Doesn't have any relation to how much RAM you have, it's dependent on
your pfblocker config. Info here:
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,48716.0.html
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
On 05/03/2012 05:32 AM, Chris Buechler wrote:
Doesn't have any relation to how much RAM you have, it's dependent on
your pfblocker config. Info here:
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,48716.0.html
___
I may be a little dense, and need a howto
Hi!
I can sign that, we often sell those exact systems, and compatibility and
stability is not an issue with fpSense.
We often use a 4 ports Intel Gigabit NIC too, and this specific one works with
pfSense inbox drivers:
E1G44ET2Intel Gigabit ET2 Quad Port Server Adapter
The atom
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
On Behalf Of Waugh G
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 6:52 AM
To: pfSense support and discussion
Subject: Re: [pfSense] pfBlocker errors
On 05/03/2012 05:32 AM, Chris Buechler wrote:
Doesn't have any relation to
Hey all,
We've been experimenting with Netgate appliances running pfSense 2 this year at
a few small clients. We're still learning the feature set.
We have a client that's 30 people growing to 75. They need a router that can:
- provide granular QoS for VoIP, videoconferencing, and
Guys Please help me on this!
I have posted my issue on Forum can you please take look and comment.
I really thank you for your valuable time spend on helping Thank you! :)
FORUM POST LINK:
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,49043.msg259653.html#msg259653
On 3 May 2012 12:23, Abdullah
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Noam Birnbaum
n...@maccentricsolutions.com wrote:
Is pfSense the right choice for this environment?
You didn't mention the (arguably) most important feature of your
proposed environment, which would be throughput expectations.
For the feature set you mentioned
Good call, David --
They current have dual WAN -- 40/40 WiMAX and 50/10 cable. I expect that as
they grow these pipes will at least double.
As for their *expectations* -- they are a web development startup in San
Francisco, so… they have very high expectations. They'll swallow whatever
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Noam Birnbaum
n...@maccentricsolutions.com wrote:
Good call, David --
They current have dual WAN -- 40/40 WiMAX and 50/10 cable. I expect that as
they grow these pipes will at least double.
pfsense should do fine, but last I looked most of the netgate stuff
On 2012-05-03 07:45, Ulrik Lunddahl wrote:
Hi!
I can sign that, we often sell those exact systems, and compatibility and
stability is not an issue with fpSense.
We often use a 4 ports Intel Gigabit NIC too, and this specific one works with
pfSense inbox drivers:
E1G44ET2Intel
Anyone here used the Netgate m1n1wall 2D3 / 2D13 Blue?
Does this unit run the full version of PFSense, and is 256 MB for a home
office deployment enough?
Do I need third nic, and separate my WLAN and lan, and then just have vlans
for each network and a secure tunnel bettween lan and wlan?
--
On May 3, 2012 1:34 PM, Abdullah Nihan abd@gmail.com wrote:
Guys Please help me on this!
I have posted my issue on Forum can you please take look and comment.
I really thank you for your valuable time spend on helping Thank you! :)
FORUM POST LINK:
I have used one of these (Supermicro SYS-5015A-EHF-D525), the only issue I have
run into with the one I have, is that IP KVM for some reason isn't working as
expected.
Specifically... if I VPN into the firewall (PPTP), I can't seem to be able to
access the IP-KVM.
If I remote into a machine
-Original Message-
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
On Behalf Of Chris Buechler
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 1:21 PM
To: pfSense support and discussion
Subject: Re: [pfSense] is pfSense the right choice?
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Noam
15 matches
Mail list logo
