Re: [pfSense] dual ISP BGP

2013-05-27 Thread Seth Mos
On 28-5-2013 1:13, Zach Underwood wrote: > Thanks for your help. I have made the change from -all to -self and > emailed the ISP to see if that fixed it. As far as optimization is I > will look into it. Right now we have large blocks many /24 that are not > in use at this time. We dont want to adve

Re: [pfSense] dual ISP BGP

2013-05-27 Thread Adam Thompson
IIRC, OpenBGPD ships with a looking-glass CGI script. Not sure if it's in the pfSense pkg or not. You'd have to figure out how to get the webserver to run it anyway, but that's one way. -Adam Zach Underwood wrote: >___ >List mailing list >List@lis

Re: [pfSense] dual ISP BGP

2013-05-27 Thread Zach Underwood
I after I get some things fixed with a 3rd ISP I will change the routes to make them bigger networks. Since we are talking about bgp and pfsense. Is there anything that can be done to the status page. I have moded my page to not show routes(page will crash if I show them). Could we get a nice inter

Re: [pfSense] dual ISP BGP

2013-05-27 Thread Chris Bagnall
On 28/5/13 12:13 am, Zach Underwood wrote: Right now we have large blocks many /24 that are not in use at this time. You lucky person, you :-) The rest of us are struggling to get assignments of new v4 space, so I suspect you're sitting on a gold mine there... We dont want to advertise tho

Re: [pfSense] dual ISP BGP

2013-05-27 Thread Zach Underwood
Thanks for your help. I have made the change from -all to -self and emailed the ISP to see if that fixed it. As far as optimization is I will look into it. Right now we have large blocks many /24 that are not in use at this time. We dont want to advertise those networks because we don't want all ga

Re: [pfSense] dual ISP BGP

2013-05-27 Thread Adam Thompson
On 2013-05-27 13:30, Chris Bagnall wrote: On 27/5/13 6:18 pm, Zach Underwood wrote: network 216.105.159.0/24 network 216.105.158.0/24 network 216.105.157.0/24 network 216.105.128.0/24 network 216.105.135.0/24 network 216.105.136.0/23 network 216.105.141.0/24 network 216.105.143.0/24 network 216.

Re: [pfSense] dual ISP BGP

2013-05-27 Thread Adam Thompson
On 2013-05-27 12:18, Zach Underwood wrote: > I am using the openbpgd package on pfsense 2.0.3 x64bit. The problem I am having it that the full bgp table I am getting from ISP1 is sent to ISP2 as my networks. ISP 2 is filtering so I don't break there network. Here is my bgpd.conf file > > AS

Re: [pfSense] dual ISP BGP

2013-05-27 Thread Chris Bagnall
On 27/5/13 6:18 pm, Zach Underwood wrote: network 216.105.159.0/24 network 216.105.158.0/24 network 216.105.157.0/24 network 216.105.128.0/24 network 216.105.135.0/24 network 216.105.136.0/23 network 216.105.141.0/24 network 216.105.143.0/24 network 216.105.144.0/22 network 216.105.153.0/24 netwo

[pfSense] PF causing watchdog timeout errors in the members of a transparent FW bridge.

2013-05-27 Thread Giorgio Emanuel
Hi guys, I'm having trouble with watchdog timeout - resitting to configure a transparent firewall. Use this server between the core switch (catalyst) and my core router (cisco). When I configure the bridge with the options net.link.bridge.pfil_member: 1 and net.link.bridge.pfil_bridge: 1, the syste

[pfSense] dual ISP BGP

2013-05-27 Thread Zach Underwood
I am using the openbpgd package on pfsense 2.0.3 x64bit. The problem I am having it that the full bgp table I am getting from ISP1 is sent to ISP2 as my networks. ISP 2 is filtering so I don't break there network. Here is my bgpd.conf file AS 11672 fib-update yes holdtime 90 router-id 107.7.161.82