> > Intel actually sells MLC instead of SLC ( iirc they had a series with SLC > but they are to expensive, not sure if they sell those further ) > > > They do. As you note, they are more expensive per bit than MLC. > > The last thing i heard of, was that they now use HET MLC instead of SLC. So all actual series uses those newer MLC-Chips http://www.tomshardware.de/ssd-710-enterprise-x25-e-MLC-HET,testberichte-240941.html sorry, i didn't found it in english. Shortly it says: SLC is out HET-MLC (only) is in.
> Intel SSD (actual series afaik MLC) compensate the different endurance > with more memory-chips and the controller software that round-robins > the writings over the entire disk except a reserved space for dying cells. > > > Same as it ever was. Wear-leveling. > Yup, whats the point now here? Not everyone knows about this technique, so i mentioned it explicitly. i guess some others, with may be less experience, are also reading our messages. > And yes there are manufacturers with much cleaner production and higer > quality of the memory-chips. > > > Did I not say, "Intel, Crucial/Micron, Samsung"? > if i remember correctly YES. did i said anything different? o_O my statement was a confirmation and slightly explanation how it comes to those quality differences. ;-) it lets you guess also how good the quality of other products from the same company is.
_______________________________________________ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
