i have been working on Pfsense for few years its a best firewall tool that
i have worked with.
Now i want assign quota to every IP behind the firewall.
let say i have a static quota of 10 GB . now i want to assign 10 GB each
client ip.
for example.
192.168.1.10 = 10GB limit
192.168.1.11 = 10GB
On Sep 17, 2014, at 20:48, Wade Blackwell wa...@bablam.com wrote:
Good afternoon all,
I added ntopng to my platform via command line and restarted the
webconfigurator. I was expecting to see the package show up under
diagnostics, as it did on my other platform that I installed the
Hi !
Does CVE-2004-0230 affect pfSense 2.1.5 ?
regards,
Martin
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
According to
https://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-14:19.tcp.asc
the workaround is to turn on pf.
Therefore, the answer to your question is technically yes but in
practice no.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Martin Fuchs mar...@fuchs-kiel.de wrote:
Hi !
Does CVE-2004-0230
sounds reasonable ;-)
thanks a lot,
martin
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 09:03:16 -0400
From: vi...@khera.org
To: list@lists.pfsense.org
Subject: Re: [pfSense] CVE-2004-0230
According to
https://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-14:19.tcp.asc
the workaround is to turn on pf.
Hail,
I have a strange issue. I get default route by OSPF. And that is fine. But I,
then, need not to
have default routes and gateways configured in. So far, so good. Now I need to
set a route to
another network, no default route then.
I create the gateway, and as I have no other one the WebUI
On 9/18/2014 8:55 AM, Martin Fuchs wrote:
Does CVE-2004-0230 affect pfSense 2.1.5 ?
As Vick mentions, practically the answer is 'no'.
There are some rare cases when it might, however. It would require:
1. Disabled pf (System Advanced, Firewall/NAT tab, check Disable all
packet filtering)
1a.
Maybe a blog post about this?
-- Jim
On Sep 18, 2014, at 10:01, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
On 9/18/2014 8:55 AM, Martin Fuchs wrote:
Does CVE-2004-0230 affect pfSense 2.1.5 ?
As Vick mentions, practically the answer is 'no'.
There are some rare cases when it might, however. It
Hi
I'll try to make this as short as possible without leaving important
information
I've been running a pfsense 1.2 box for several years, all is fine. I now
need to have an additional WAN connection which will be made up of 3 adsl
lines bonded by a firebrick. From the POV of the pfsense its
On 18/9/14 8:13 pm, Nick Upson wrote:
We have a new /27 range to go with this new installation and here is the
problem, external ping/connectivity to the new IPs doesn't work except one
the .225 address, it seems the firebrick requires ARP in order to route
them. I have setup several different
10 matches
Mail list logo
