I understand it's ideal to have limiters on the sending end. It's a long story but I'm trying to set them on the receiving end of an rsync copy.
I understand in 2.2-2.3 one should have them on the LAN interface. This is on 2.3.3_1. In this scenario the remote server is x.x.x.x and the LAN computer is 10.1.2.12:22, and we have a NAT rule forwarding port 2222 to 22. Firewall rule: IPv4 TCP/UDP x.x.x.x * 10.1.2.12 22 (SSH) Two limiters are set on in/out. This firewall rule shows zero traffic in or out. No other firewall rules show traffic from * to LAN. Diagnostics/States shows: LAN tcp x.x.x.x:46098 -> 10.1.2.12:22 (and shows traffic) Is the rule+limiter not being applied because the port 2222 is NATted to 22? Or because the NAT happens on the WAN side and the LAN rule isn't even used? Thanks, Steve Yates ITS, Inc. _______________________________________________ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
