[pfSense] Multiwan

2012-08-08 Thread Andrew @ ATMlogic.ca
Just wondering a few things about multiwan. In this case what I am wondering is can I take multiple Wifi bridges funnel them into pf, and have one Lan connection that (from what I understand) does some basic round robin load balancing. I am aware this will give me some trouble on some websites.

[pfSense] Limit all or per user?

2012-07-13 Thread Andrew @ ATMlogic.ca
Just wondering how others have handled this in the past. I want to broadcast to about 40-50 devices (pc/tablet/phone for the most part) I want mine, the wife's and perhaps a few other family members to have full speed, and not blocking torrents, streaming etc. Now. for the other users I j

[pfSense] Hotel setup $$

2012-05-02 Thread Andrew @ ATMlogic.ca
Just wondering if some of you are willing to give me an idea what you charge for a pf setup for hotel wireless (or RV Park etc) I have done a few of them but really. I just charge whatever I think the market will bear ;-)(Sadly, in some cases I spend 4 hours setup, and pocket about $100.oo

Re: [pfSense] pf vrs mono?

2012-05-01 Thread Andrew @ ATMlogic.ca
>You have the same subnet on WAN and OPT1. >Remove the OPT1 (or move to a different subnet) and it will probably >start working. >mailman/listinfo/list Did a factory reset assigned WAN and LAN and no OPT have not touched ANY other config. (Also have not tested with laptop on LAN yet, but will j

Re: [pfSense] pf vrs mono?

2012-05-01 Thread Andrew @ ATMlogic.ca
There just is not enough detail to say why it's happening. Even seeing the output of the banner on the console menu would be more than we're seeing here. Going on pure speculation only gets us so far. As below. Connecting a PC to sis0 (through a switch) will get an IP (10.0.0.100) however and thr

Re: [pfSense] pf vrs mono?

2012-05-01 Thread Andrew @ ATMlogic.ca
On 5/1/2012 10:48 AM, Andrew @ ATMlogic.ca wrote: > Everything would be in default, my network is 192.168.0.x, WAN is setup for > DHCP, no other config. The default LAN in pfSense is 192.168.1.x, same as m0n0wall. Yes, aware of that MY office network is 192.168.0.x > Two identi

Re: [pfSense] pf vrs mono?

2012-05-01 Thread Andrew @ ATMlogic.ca
On 5/1/2012 9:33 AM, Andrew @ ATMlogic.ca wrote: > So I think your exactly on it. In all my testing / setup the WAN would > be getting a private (192.168/16) address. So is block ON by default? > (And guessing off by default in Mono?) In a default config with a DHCP WAN, you can sur

Re: [pfSense] pf vrs mono?

2012-05-01 Thread Andrew @ ATMlogic.ca
on turned on, unless your WAN network lies in such a private address space, too. Hope this helps. Thanks Bryant Zimmerman (ZK Tech Inc.) 616-855-1030 Ext. 2003 _ From: "Andrew @ ATMlogic.ca" Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 8:56 AM To: list@lists.pfsense.org Subject: [pfSen

[pfSense] pf vrs mono?

2012-05-01 Thread Andrew @ ATMlogic.ca
Just wondering if someone can help me with what I would think is "basic" setup. I want to run pf instead of monowall on net4801 hardware. (Soekris) When I install monowall it for the most part just up and works, a very quick trip to the console to establish Eth0,Eth1 and Eth2 and I am ready fo

Re: [pfSense] pfsense on endian mini hardware

2012-04-13 Thread Andrew @ ATMlogic.ca
I have had great luck with the IDE à CF addaptors (you want the ones with the power adaptor that uses the 'floppy drive' connector) I have many m0n0walls and a few pfSense boxes running with these Not sure about the rest of your hardware however, the easy way to tell would be to just load it t