Op zaterdag 18 april 2015 heeft Bob McClure Jr het
volgende geschreven:
> I am a pfsense newbie. After my homebrew firewall crashed, a
> colleague recommended pfsense, so I went for it. I'm running the
> latest update of pfsense.
>
> I have a pretty basic three-piece setup -- WAN, LAN, and OPT1
Op dinsdag 31 maart 2015 heeft Scott Lambert het
volgende geschreven:
> I remember seeing something years ago about the ability to use pfSense
> as an appliance to run a dedicated process. I think the post was
> specifically about running a name server.
>
> My search-fu is not great enough to lo
Op 20-03-15 om 07:32 schreef Amit Saxena:
Dear Team
Anyone can send my link to download pfsense 2.1 iso
Redhat
___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
The fi
Op 20-03-15 om 07:32 schreef Amit Saxena:
Dear Team
Anyone can send my link to download pfsense 2.1 iso
Redhat
___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
https:
Op 30-01-15 om 11:33 schreef Doug Lytle:
Johan Hendriks wrote:
Sorry for the offtopic question, but what do you do with this list?
Do you block all traffic coming from those ip addresses. or just to
some services ?
All traffic from and to
Doug
Thank you,
Everyday we learn something new
Op 29-01-15 om 16:08 schreef Doug Lytle:
I'm building a new 64bit pfSense 2.2, running under ESXi 5.5.
I've noted 2 things.
1.) Bulk Alias imports button no longer exist on the main alias page.
2.) When trying to create an alias that links to an online listing of
blacklisted IP addresses, t
may...@maykel.sytes.net schreef:
Hi, I interested in captured in rrd graph total traffic bandwith
consumed for wan, for example.
I have installed the plugin rrd grah summary, but only show graph this
month.
How captured the bandwith total for months?
Thanks in advanced.
Op 26-2-2013 13:49, Luiz Gustavo Costa
schreef:
Hi guys !
I have worked in the Samba4 package for pfsense, not only act as a
domain member, but also act as a domain controller and i see this as an
opportunity to extend the pfsense to be more than a firewall and act
Another thing you can do is add facebook.com to your dns server and
redirect facebook.com to 127.0.0.1
or better set up a local webpage with a notify that facebook.com is
inaccessable
gr
johan Hendriks
Jonatas Baldin schreef:
This is possible becasue of HTTPs procotol. Try to access the
Ermal Luçi schreef:
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Ståle Johnsen wrote:
Hi,
We have a customer running pfsense 2.0 and today the customer got an email
from their ISP claiming that someone on the network was infected with torpig
with the following description: "contacted known sinkhole (torpig
n.
Thank you
Dickie
Could it be that you did not adjust the outbound NAT rules.
regards
Johan Hendriks
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
justino garcia schreef:
Would four
http://www.applianceshop.eu/index.php/opnsense-rack-edition-pfsense-appliance.html
do me justice.
I will have one Main DC in one office, and all others speak to that
DC, and database / app server for dental stuff?
--
Justin
IT-TECH
__
Chris Buechler schreef:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Johan Hendriks
wrote:
It is on the forum as well, and some more people seems to have that issue.
Stop here, you're hijacking a thread. Bump your own thread if you want
to continue.
___
Chris Buechler schreef:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 5:05 AM, Johan Hendriks
wrote:
But has the following issue been resolved on the final version 2.0, if not i
think it is a rather bad, and a lot of people get bitten by it.
http://lists.pfsense.org/pipermail/list/2011-September/000128.html
ation again.
regards
Johan Hendriks.
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
g for over two months now.
On and off, but i learnd a lot, and that is a nice bonus also.
But now i would like this thing become fixed ASAP :D
regards,
Johan
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Johan Hendriks
mailto:j.hendr...@schavemaker.com>> wrote:
Ermal Luçi schreef:
On
Ermal Luçi schreef:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Johan Hendriks
wrote:
Once more
I am running the latest snapshot of today.
I do use the old pptp adsl way to make connection with our provider.
It works for us a really long time very well.
This works great on all versions of monowall and
Ermal Luçi schreef:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Johan Hendriks
wrote:
Once more
I am running the latest snapshot of today.
I do use the old pptp adsl way to make connection with our provider.
It works for us a really long time very well.
This works great on all versions of monowall and
nterface.
So would it be wise to set WAN = "{ vr1 pptp1}" on 2.0
And how can i do that for a test.
regards
Johan Hendriks
Below are my /tmp/rules.debug files
The version 2.0 is from a cleanly installed sytem.
The version from 1.2.3 is from the working one, and i deleted some of
19 matches
Mail list logo
