2.4
Am 2017-05-16 13:30, schrieb Sean Cavanaugh:
> The only sane way to do this on a single box would be by installing a
> hypervisor on the server ( such as VMware ESXi) and running pfsense as
> a virtual machine within it as well as a second virtual machine to
> host any other
The only sane way to do this on a single box would be by installing a
hypervisor on the server ( such as VMware ESXi) and running pfsense as a
virtual machine within it as well as a second virtual machine to host any other
non-firewall related applications (MySQL, FreeRADIUS).
There is obviousl
Make sure to set "no cdp enable" on the port that's going to your cable
modem. A lot of cable companies will shut down connections that broadcast
those by default so as not to broadcast the networks together.
I had same issue with my Comcast connection until I found out about the CDP
issue.
Crappy email client and top posting.
also remember the config for pfSense is stored in XML, not the .conf file
directly.
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On
Behalf Of Adam Thompson
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 10:38 AM
To: pfSense support and di
-Original Message-
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
On Behalf Of Vieri
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2012 6:59 PM
To: pfSense support and discussion
Subject: Re: [pfSense] pfSense features
Thanks everyone for your feedback on such a general que
> -Original Message-
> From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org
[mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
> On Behalf Of Vieri
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 2:50 PM
> To: list@lists.pfsense.org
> Subject: [pfSense] pfSense features
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to pfSense and FreeBSD. I'm coming f
Personal experience is that full TOE impairs speed. Every server we’ve had that
has it enabled gets lowered network throughput. Checksum would be only
offloading that would benefit.
PowerD under VM doesn’t do anything. VMware already does those types of power
management.
From: list-b
gt; On 8/13/2012 7:43 PM, Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
> > The following input errors were detected:
> > . The IP address must not be within the DHCP range for this interface.
> >
> > This seems counter intuitive as every other DHCP server that I dealt
> > with it HAS to be wi
2.1-BETA0 (amd64)
built on Mon Aug 13 14:40:12 EDT 2012
Trying to set a static DHCP mapping for a device that can only do DHCP on my
network.
So I do the smart thing of going to Status > DHCP Leases > Add static for
this MAC.
I put in the Address I would like it to use..
The following input er
This is why I just hit the reset button on the modem to reset the MAC
address lock.
-Original Message-
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
On Behalf Of Gavin Will
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 12:26 PM
To: pfSense support and discussion
Subject: Re
>
>Once you have an incoming connection (first time) to, let's say from INT X
to INT Y, dest IP Z, dest port P, will these alternative >rules be evaluated
in same moment or not?
>
>- Evaluate INPUT on INT X, dest IP Z, dest port P
>- Evaluate OUTPUT on INT Y, dest IP Z, dest port P
>If the answer
hat having WAN on RFC1918 space fucks up
site to site IPsec tunnel?
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 02:36:21PM -0400, Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
> If provider is providing you NATed internet access...my best guess is
> you
It's not NATed. They're rewriting the packet headers. The only NAT there
]
> On Behalf Of Eugen Leitl
> Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 12:58 PM
> To: pfSense support and discussion
> Subject: Re: [pfSense] can it be that having WAN on RFC1918 space fucks up
> site to site IPsec tunnel?
>
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 12:53:08PM -0400, Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
How are you connecting to your 10.x.x.x address if that address space is
non-routable over the internet? Are you NATing from the true internet edge
device you have?
> -Original Message-
> From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org
[mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
> On Behalf Of Eugen Leit
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
On Behalf Of Lazy Sod
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 1:44 PM
To: list@lists.pfsense.org
Subject: [pfSense] pfsense gaming
Looking to switch from Monowall to Pfsense for gaming reasons; I have one
Xbox 360 and have had no l
> -Original Message-
> From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org
[mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
> On Behalf Of Sean Cavanaugh
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 12:25 PM
> To: 'pfSense support and discussion'
> Subject: Re: [pfSense] pf vrs mono?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org
[mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
> On Behalf Of Andrew @ ATMlogic.ca
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 12:02 PM
> To: 'pfSense support and discussion'
> Subject: Re: [pfSense] pf vrs mono?
>
> >You have the same subnet on WAN
I honestly see TOE cause more issues than its supposed to fix. Basic
hardware offload seems to work fine for me.
Besides switching in a server will never match speed of an ASIC
-Original Message-
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
On Behalf Of Kar
> To: list@lists.pfsense.org
> From: u...@lubik.ca
> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:02:58 -0400
> Subject: [pfSense] sflow/netflow software
>
> Hi,
>
> Any recommendations for free software for sflow/netflow data analysis?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ugo
>
the cisco tool is free
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/pr
I could lie and show a screen cap of mine that claims it has and uses 10g
interfaces :-p
Realistically, there are sizing guides on the forum/wiki to handle different
bandwidths. People are running them gig+ in production datacenters. Golden
rule of routers/firewalls: "The more rules/actions/ad
20 matches
Mail list logo
