Re: [pfSense] 2.1.6 NAT BUG - All rules deleted !!

2017-06-07 Thread Karl Fife
2.1 won't offer an upgrade if the SSD is too small. If you have a 1GB CF, you will have flash a larger one. On 6/7/2017 9:16 PM, Alexandre Paradis wrote: 2.3 support 32 bits, 2.4 doesn't. Tomer, you should upgrade to the latest version. On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 10:01 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote:

Re: [pfSense] 2.1.6 NAT BUG - All rules deleted !!

2017-06-07 Thread Alexandre Paradis
2.3 support 32 bits, 2.4 doesn't. Tomer, you should upgrade to the latest version. On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 10:01 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote: > Probably that 2.2 support ended 32-bit boards, IIRC. > > Or maybe that was 2.3 > > > > On Jun 7, 2017, at 7:46 AM, Oliver Hansen > wrote: > > > > Is there a

Re: [pfSense] 2.1.6 NAT BUG - All rules deleted !!

2017-06-07 Thread Ryan Coleman
Probably that 2.2 support ended 32-bit boards, IIRC. Or maybe that was 2.3 > On Jun 7, 2017, at 7:46 AM, Oliver Hansen wrote: > > Is there a reason you're still on version 2.1.6? > > On Jun 7, 2017 5:41 AM, "pfsense-l...@y-tech.co.il" < > pfsense-l...@y-tech.co.il> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >

Re: [pfSense] 2.1.6 NAT BUG - All rules deleted !!

2017-06-07 Thread Oliver Hansen
Is there a reason you're still on version 2.1.6? On Jun 7, 2017 5:41 AM, "pfsense-l...@y-tech.co.il" < pfsense-l...@y-tech.co.il> wrote: > Hi all, > > I just encountered a major bug: > Adding a new port forward rule caused a deletion of all firewall rules, > ALL. > I restored the configuration fr

[pfSense] 2.1.6 NAT BUG - All rules deleted !!

2017-06-07 Thread pfsense-l...@y-tech.co.il
Hi all, I just encountered a major bug: Adding a new port forward rule caused a deletion of all firewall rules, ALL. I restored the configuration from backup and tried to add it again - same result. I can't find any documented bug. Please advise. Thanks, Tomer. -- This message has been scanne