Re: [pfSense] Installation issues of latest release (2.3.2) resolved?

On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 23:19:45 -0500 Jim Thompson wrote: > pfSense is normally tested on the devices that Netgate has released as > products over the past two years. > > pfSense 2.3.2 was tested on the following devices and hypervisors: > > SG-2220 (eMMC and M.2), SG-2440 (eMMC and mSATA), SG-486

Re: [pfSense] Installation issues of latest release (2.3.2) resolved?

On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 12:19 AM, Jim Thompson wrote: > As a reminder, pfSense 2.4 will not support i386, and will not support the > 'nano' image. Does this imply that we will need to do a full re-install on our Netgate APU's or will there be a clean self-upgrade process?

Re: [pfSense] Installation issues of latest release (2.3.2) resolved?

On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 10:37 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote: > So does this effect APUs running the AMD64 architecture? I updated from 2.3.1 to 2.3.2 the APU at my home office with zero problems. It just took a good long time to clone the boot slice before updating, which also took a long time. The actu

Re: [pfSense] Installation issues of latest release (2.3.2) resolved?

As I remember it Alix support is not part of 2.4. > On Jul 31, 2016, at 5:33 AM, Adrian Zaugg wrote: > > > > On 30.07.16 06:19, Jim Thompson wrote: >> As a reminder, pfSense 2.4 will not support i386, and will not support the >> 'nano' image. > Do you mean by "i386" 32-bit X86 or really just

Re: [pfSense] Installation issues of latest release (2.3.2) resolved?

On 30.07.16 06:19, Jim Thompson wrote: > As a reminder, pfSense 2.4 will not support i386, and will not support the > 'nano' image. Do you mean by "i386" 32-bit X86 or really just i386 (asking because of Alix)? Regards, Adrian. ___ pfSense mailing list

Re: [pfSense] Installation issues of latest release (2.3.2) resolved?

Being that the current release is FreeBSD 10.3 based its a pretty good bet that if you don't see an image in the download directory for the ARM architecture then your answer is no. Here is some information on FreeBSD ARM support for further knowledge. "AARCH64" https://wiki.freebsd.org/FreeBSD/a

Re: [pfSense] Installation issues of latest release (2.3.2) resolved?

Will the 2.4 run on Odroid C2 (arm, quad 64bit) running with the Ethernet and a USB<->Ethernet external converter to get 2 ports. On 07/29/2016 11:19 PM, Jim Thompson wrote: As a reminder, pfSense 2.4 will not support i386, and will not support the 'nano' image. We are including ARM support (f

Re: [pfSense] Installation issues of latest release (2.3.2) resolved?

Thank you :) > On Jul 29, 2016, at 11:19 PM, Jim Thompson > wrote: > > > SG-2220 (eMMC and M.2), SG-2440 (eMMC and mSATA), SG-4860 (eMMC and mSATA), > SG-8860 (eMMC and mSATA), 7541 (CF and SSD), 7551 (CF and SSD), APU (not > APU2) (nano on SD, full install on SD, and m

Re: [pfSense] Installation issues of latest release (2.3.2) resolved?

pfSense is normally tested on the devices that Netgate has released as products over the past two years. pfSense 2.3.2 was tested on the following devices and hypervisors: SG-2220 (eMMC and M.2), SG-2440 (eMMC and mSATA), SG-4860 (eMMC and mSATA), SG-8860 (eMMC and mSATA), 7541 (CF and SSD), 7551

Re: [pfSense] Installation issues of latest release (2.3.2) resolved?

I presume you mean AMD… But that’s what the 64-bit code base is labeled as, regardless of Intel, AMD or other. > On Jul 29, 2016, at 9:50 PM, Alfredo Tapia Sabogal > wrote: > > So far i know pfsense have some issues related to the architecture of ADM > > CHEERS > > Alfredo Tapia Sabogal __

Re: [pfSense] Installation issues of latest release (2.3.2) resolved?

So far i know pfsense have some issues related to the architecture of ADM CHEERS Alfredo Tapia Sabogal El jul. 29, 2016 9:38 PM, "Ryan Coleman" escribió: > Have we established an official bug for the newest release? I can babysit > one installation on Sunday without an issue but it’s the one I

[pfSense] Installation issues of latest release (2.3.2) resolved?

Have we established an official bug for the newest release? I can babysit one installation on Sunday without an issue but it’s the one I cannot afford to lose (retail shop) that needs updating sooner rather than later (as I won’t have the time for a month)…. So does this effect APUs running the