On Mon 21 Apr 2014 22:46:57 NZST +1200, Christoph Hanle wrote:
> > Are there any USB Ethernet adapters that actually work with pfsense?
> > Reliably? I am looking for reports from those who have tried, not the
> > freebsd supported HW list - that list is too long and not really
> > trustworthy (I
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
> You’ll need to define “affordable”. You’ll also need to state if you’re
> looking for PCI, PCI-x or PCIe cards.
Only sensible definition I can see is:
cost of business disruption from current device failing > cost of
putting in new device
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Volker Kuhlmann
wrote:
> I've been running pfsense for many years (and been very happy with it)
> on scrapped PCs with a Sun 4-port Ethernet PCI card because I need 5
> Ethernet ports.
>
> Now freebsd dieing on the hme driver effectively turns those cards into
> sc
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Stefan Baur
wrote:
>
> If Adam is willing to donate his spare card to you dev folks, and maybe
> Volker buys a Gold Membership (in case he doesn't have one already),
> would that significantly increase the chances of having a working hme
> driver in a future relea
On April 22, 2014 4:58:14 PM CDT, Jim Thompson wrote:
>
>On Apr 22, 2014, at 3:42 PM, Volker Kuhlmann
>wrote:
>
>> On Wed 23 Apr 2014 05:02:59 NZST +1200, Jim Thompson wrote:
>>
Are there any USB Ethernet adapters that actually work with
>pfsense?
Reliably? I am looking for reports fro
On Apr 22, 2014, at 3:42 PM, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> On Wed 23 Apr 2014 05:02:59 NZST +1200, Jim Thompson wrote:
>
>>> Are there any USB Ethernet adapters that actually work with pfsense?
>>> Reliably? I am looking for reports from those who have tried, not the
>>> freebsd supported HW list -
On Wed 23 Apr 2014 05:02:59 NZST +1200, Jim Thompson wrote:
> > Are there any USB Ethernet adapters that actually work with pfsense?
> > Reliably? I am looking for reports from those who have tried, not the
> > freebsd supported HW list - that list is too long and not really
> > trustworthy (I hav
On Apr 22, 2014, at 12:27 PM, Stefan Baur
wrote:
> Am 22.04.2014 18:29, schrieb Jim Thompson:
>
>> It's not like we disabled the hme driver.
>
> Nobody accused you of intentionally disabling it. Manure happens. :-) Relax.
>
>
>> We have no ability to test it, since we don't have one of thes
Am 22.04.2014 18:29, schrieb Jim Thompson:
> It's not like we disabled the hme driver.
Nobody accused you of intentionally disabling it. Manure happens. :-) Relax.
> We have no ability to test it, since we don't have one of these cards. Nor
> are we likely to invest in one.
Over in the "Inter
On Apr 20, 2014, at 5:32 PM, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> I've been running pfsense for many years (and been very happy with it)
> on scrapped PCs with a Sun 4-port Ethernet PCI card because I need 5
> Ethernet ports.
>
> Now freebsd dieing on the hme driver effectively turns those cards into
> scr
> On Apr 22, 2014, at 10:39, Stefan Baur wrote:
>
> In fact, I'd be petty disappointed, too, if a newer pfSense release
> stopped working on my hardware and it the whole issue appeared out of the
> blue (== no "hwe driver no longer supported" or similar notice in the release
> notes).
Your po
Am 22.04.2014 17:12, schrieb Jim Thompson:
> Hardly.
>
> Before damning pfSense, please try it on something other than "scrapped
> PCs" containing an Ethernet controller from 1998:
He wasn't damning pfSense in general, nor pfSense's network drivers in
general, he was damning the combination of t
> On Apr 22, 2014, at 7:26, Stefan Baur wrote:
>
> Am 22.04.2014 14:19, schrieb Vick Khera:
>> I disagree that is a sufficient condition, unless you restrict this
>> statement to hme interfaces.
>
> From his previous posts, I think it's pretty obvious that that is what
> he meant. :-)
Hardly.
Am 22.04.2014 14:19, schrieb Vick Khera:
> I disagree that is a sufficient condition, unless you restrict this
> statement to hme interfaces.
>From his previous posts, I think it's pretty obvious that that is what
he meant. :-)
-Stefan
___
List mailing
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:52 AM, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> A sufficient condition to kill the pfsense system is for an interface to
> briefly lose physical connection (or for the connected device to be
> turned off). The same results from pfsense's web gui restarting
> interfaces, e.g. from changin
On Tue 22 Apr 2014 00:04:47 NZST +1200, Vick Khera wrote:
> > Now freebsd dieing on the hme driver effectively turns those cards into
> > scrap and I'm stuck. What are alternatives now?
>
> Just curious, if you insert a small hub/switch between your printer
> and the NIC does that fix it?
No it
gnall
Sendt: 21. april 2014 03:14
Til: list@lists.pfsense.org
Emne: Re: [pfSense] Interface options for pfsense
>> The GS108T-200 is the one with a web-based config tool
Worth adding that you can pick up the HP 1700-8 for less than £60 these days,
now that it's been superceded by the 1810-x
On 21 Apr 2014 at 10:32, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> I've been running pfsense for many years (and been very happy with it)
> on scrapped PCs with a Sun 4-port Ethernet PCI card because I need 5
> Ethernet ports.
This was discussed on the list last year.
[pfSense] 4 port ethernet card -- STARTECH S
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Volker Kuhlmann
wrote:
> I've been running pfsense for many years (and been very happy with it)
> on scrapped PCs with a Sun 4-port Ethernet PCI card because I need 5
> Ethernet ports.
>
> Now freebsd dieing on the hme driver effectively turns those cards into
> sc
On 21.04.2014 00:32 Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> Now freebsd dieing on the hme driver effectively turns those cards into
> scrap and I'm stuck. What are alternatives now?
>
> Are there any other 4-port cards that are supported by pfsense in
> practice (not just in theory), that are also affordable?
I
Am 21.04.2014 02:13, schrieb Volker Kuhlmann:
> There is no 'doze in the house and on no account will I add a
> Billy-dependency to my infrastructure. Any manufacturer too stupid to make
> their stuff controllable by open source software can sell elsewhere.
> Period.
Well, there is http://sourcef
The GS108T-200 is the one with a web-based config tool
Worth adding that you can pick up the HP 1700-8 for less than £60 these
days, now that it's been superceded by the 1810-x series switches.
Fairly intuitive web interface and talks SNMP too. Admittedly not
gigabit, but as a multi-WAN VLAN
On Mon 21 Apr 2014 10:51:13 NZST +1200, Stefan Baur wrote:
Thanks muchly for the tip, Stefan!
There is no 'doze in the house and on no account will I add a
Billy-dependency to my infrastructure. Any manufacturer too stupid to make
their stuff controllable by open source software can sell elsewher
Am 21.04.2014 00:40, schrieb Stefan Baur:
> I heard the 8-port model GS108E is actually easier to configure (Web GUI
> instead of Adobe-Air-based proprietary tool), but I can't claim personal
> experience with that, so don't take my word for it, but ask someone who
> actually configured it.
Errat
Am 21.04.2014 00:32, schrieb Volker Kuhlmann:
> The frequently recommended option of using VLANs may look good for
> larger commercial networks, but just buying a VLAN capable switch costs
> more than a suitable pfsense box and brings the power budget of the
> combination to the same level as a scr
I've been running pfsense for many years (and been very happy with it)
on scrapped PCs with a Sun 4-port Ethernet PCI card because I need 5
Ethernet ports.
Now freebsd dieing on the hme driver effectively turns those cards into
scrap and I'm stuck. What are alternatives now?
Are there any other 4
26 matches
Mail list logo
