On 22 May 2014 11:43, David QuayCendre wrote:
> Yes the CPU is 64bits, I think it work to in Proxmox.
> But VMWare don't want to work on this CPU to permit to use 64bits for VM.
>
>
Yes if you want to limit yourself to using VMWare then you can't have 64bit
guests unless you have VT enabled CPU's
Yes the CPU is 64bits, I think it work to in Proxmox.
But VMWare don't want to work on this CPU to permit to use 64bits for VM.
2014-05-22 10:04 GMT+02:00 Peter Collins :
>
>
> On 22 May 2014 02:15, David QuayCendre wrote:
>
>>
>> I have a 2850, with ESX you can't have VM in 64bits (CPU to old
On 22 May 2014 02:15, David QuayCendre wrote:
>
> I have a 2850, with ESX you can't have VM in 64bits (CPU to old and VMWare
> don't work on this CPU family), but ESX is in 64bits
>
Depending what guests you want to run, you could look at using Xen with a
pv DomU.
Hello,
> Are we talking fan noise? Hard drive noise?
Fan noise, the 2850 (2U box) have 600mm fans with high speed, so it is very
noisy. And at the boot the fans are in full speed it is very noisy !
Hard drive at 15k, are noisy to, but less than CPU.
I have a 2850, with ESX you can't have VM in 6
On 5/20/2014 4:37 PM, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> On 5/20/14 11:01 AM, Jim Pingle wrote:
>> On 5/20/2014 1:45 PM, Brian Caouette wrote:
>>> For the price paid it can't be beat.
>> There is more than the sticker price to be considered.
>>
>> Note that these are just vague numbers that would vary by the sp
Many states, but not Minnesota, give you retail rates on putting power back on
the grid… in Minnesota we get producer rates (about $.03kwh instead of $.13-16
[seasonally]).
On May 20, 2014, at 15:48, Chris Bagnall wrote:
> On 20 May 2014, at 21:37, Harlan Stenn wrote:
>> Where are you that y
As far as architecture is concerned, AMD64 means its written 64-bit
processor. Although someone with more knowledge of the inner workings may
be able to tell you specific differences, it usually means it was compiled
on an AMD processor, but will work on (almost) any 64-bit processor. The
thing to
On 20 May 2014, at 21:37, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> Where are you that you get electricity for .05/kWh? Here in Oregon we
> have pretty great rates, and I think we're paying .10-.12/kWh.
I don't know where the OP hails from, but here in the UK (Scotland,
specifically, at the moment), it's 0.16 GBP/
On 5/20/14 11:01 AM, Jim Pingle wrote:
> On 5/20/2014 1:45 PM, Brian Caouette wrote:
>> For the price paid it can't be beat.
>
> There is more than the sticker price to be considered.
>
> Note that these are just vague numbers that would vary by the specific
> equipment power usage and local powe
If you had purchased something more modern, (even an APU, which uses 5-10% of
your 2850, and is completely silent) bhyve would be an option.
Which is the general direction I'm headed with pfSense for being able to run a
media center or NAS on top.
Refurb c1100s are < $600 on fleabay with 8 cor
On 20 May 2014, at 18:45, Brian Caouette wrote:
> What software is available to do virtual machines?
We use KVM.
Kind regards,
Chris
--
This email is made from 100% recycled electrons
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
https://lists.pfsens
Citrix XenServer is worth a look too.
On May 20, 2014, at 11:03 AM, Ryan Coleman wrote:
> Same here - 4 servers around the country running it.
>
>
> On May 20, 2014, at 12:57, Doug Lytle wrote:
>
What software is
available to do virtual machines?
>>
>> I'm currently using ESXi 5.1
Same here - 4 servers around the country running it.
On May 20, 2014, at 12:57, Doug Lytle wrote:
>>> What software is
>>> available to do virtual machines?
>
> I'm currently using ESXi 5.10 Free version.
>
> Doug
> ___
> List mailing list
> List@li
On 5/20/2014 1:45 PM, Brian Caouette wrote:
> For the price paid it can't be beat.
There is more than the sticker price to be considered.
Note that these are just vague numbers that would vary by the specific
equipment power usage and local power costs.
Atom, ~35W, 24h/day @ $0.05/kWh = About $1
>> What software is
>> available to do virtual machines?
I'm currently using ESXi 5.10 Free version.
Doug
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
For the price paid it can't be beat. I've seen smaller systems go for
much more so figured I had room to grow. At some point I maybe be able
to have to virtual machines on this unit and use one for a media center
or cloud backup for the home business. Are their packages available for
this? I do
I concur with Ryan's readings with the 2950s - we use them as KVM host machines
in a datacentre environment and they average around 250W under moderate load.
That's with 4x SSDs in each.
Also worth mentioning that pfSense will barely use a gig of disk space; the 6x
73GB SAS units specced by the
of choice, although 4GB of ram
is rather limiting in that regard.
--mauirixxx
From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Brian Caouette
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 6:00 AM
To: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List
Subject: Re: [pfSense] Poweredge 2850
Are we talking
On May 20, 2014, at 9:30 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
> On 20/05/2014 12:28, Ryan Coleman wrote:
>> On May 20, 2014, at 1:59, Giles Coochey wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> s
>>> Not to mention that if I ran a PE 2850 at home there would probably be
>>> complaints about the noise!!! Those things *scream* in th
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Caouette
> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 12:00
>
> Are we talking fan noise? Hard drive noise?
>
> Also a comment was made about power. What are we talking?
The general comments about how a PE2850 is overkill in the described home
environment.
>
> On 5/
Are we talking fan noise? Hard drive noise?
Also a comment was made about power. What are we talking?
On 5/20/2014 2:59 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
On 20/05/2014 02:12, Chris Bagnall wrote:
Forgive me for saying so, but that's a massive overkill for routing a
15Mbps connection. Granted, it'd be e
On 20/05/2014 12:28, Ryan Coleman wrote:
On May 20, 2014, at 1:59, Giles Coochey wrote:
s
Not to mention that if I ran a PE 2850 at home there would probably be
complaints about the noise!!! Those things *scream* in the audible sense!!!
Typically just on the first boot - mine always stoppe
On May 20, 2014, at 1:59, Giles Coochey wrote:
> On 20/05/2014 02:12, Chris Bagnall wrote:
>> Forgive me for saying so, but that's a massive overkill for routing a 15Mbps
>> connection. Granted, it'd be entirely appropriate if you were routing
>> multiple gig transits in a datacentre environme
On 20/05/2014 02:12, Chris Bagnall wrote:
Forgive me for saying so, but that's a massive overkill for routing a
15Mbps connection. Granted, it'd be entirely appropriate if you were
routing multiple gig transits in a datacentre environment where the
power consumption might be justified, but in a
On 20 May 2014, at 01:41, Brian Caouette wrote:
> So this machine should scream for a home based network from the looks of it.
> My current test machine you'll all laugh www.dlois.com/status.html is here.
> (I kepted my old domain from when I was a dialup provider) VERY old machine
> with limit
So this machine should scream for a home based network from the looks of
it. My current test machine you'll all laugh www.dlois.com/status.html
is here. (I kepted my old domain from when I was a dialup provider) VERY
old machine with limited hardware. It works well but doesn't always keep
up wi
Yea, I forgot about Itanium. For Itanium the initials are IA-64.
There is a Tier-2 supported version of FreeBSD for that processor, but
pfSense does not ship an IA-64 version.
Walter
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote:
> Itanium is the only one that’s different from AMD64. I
Itanium is the only one that’s different from AMD64. I’ve never touched an
Itanium-driven machine.
On May 19, 2014, at 18:06, Walter Parker wrote:
> The amd64 is for all 64 bit machines (amd64 and Intel EMT64)
> The x86 is for all 32 bit machines (Intel and AMD)
>
> According the spec sheet,
The amd64 is for all 64 bit machines (amd64 and Intel EMT64)
The x86 is for all 32 bit machines (Intel and AMD)
According the spec sheet,
http://www.dell.com/downloads/global/products/pedge/en/2850_specs.pdf, that
is a 64 bit machine.
Note, because AMD developed 64 for the x86 first, the BSDs cal
I think he told me it was a 64bit but wasn't sure of the Intel vs Amd.
On 5/19/2014 6:38 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote:
Check the model of the Xeon processor but I believe its 64bit. Once you check
the model if it's a 64 use the AMD version otherwise if you can't find out go
with the intel.
--
Ryan
Check the model of the Xeon processor but I believe its 64bit. Once you check
the model if it's a 64 use the AMD version otherwise if you can't find out go
with the intel.
--
Ryan Coleman
ryanjc...@me.com
m. 651.373.5015
o. 612.568.2749
> On May 19, 2014, at 17:37, Brian Caouette wrote:
>
>
Amd64 is the 64 bit version that you would want to use on that proc. I386 is
32 bit.
James
-Original Message-
From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Brian Caouette
Sent: May-19-14 4:37 PM
To: pfSense support and discussion
Subject: [pfSense] Poweredge 2850
Just ordered a Poweredge 2850. It has the xeno processor. Do I install
the Intell version or amd64?
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
33 matches
Mail list logo
