Hi !
It's meant as more than 500 ports ;-)
Am 25.11.2011 um 14:51 schrieb "Ugo Bellavance" :
> On 2011-11-23 23:43, Daniel Davis wrote:
>
>>>
>>> We are thinking about running a redundant (CARP) setup with one pfSense
>>> on our VMWare cluster, and one on a physical, separate machine.
>>
>> I
On 2011-11-23 23:43, Daniel Davis wrote:
We are thinking about running a redundant (CARP) setup with one pfSense
on our VMWare cluster, and one on a physical, separate machine.
I would not recommend a hybrid physical/virtual CARP cluster as CARP is
entirely network reliant. In a physical CAR
(Sorry for top-posting) Thanks all for all your comments!
Ugo
On 2011-11-23 13:34, Ugo Bellavance wrote:
Hi,
We're thinking about replacing our CheckPoint Firewall-1 by pfSense. We
are using only those features on Firewall-1 (R65):
- Security (default deny on everything)
- NAT (inbound (for i
On 23-11-2011 19:34, Ugo Bellavance wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're thinking about replacing our CheckPoint Firewall-1 by pfSense. We
> are using only those features on Firewall-1 (R65):
>
> - Security (default deny on everything)
Delete the LAN -> any rule on the LAN interface and you are good to go.
T
> -Original Message-
> From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-
> boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Ugo Bellavance
> Sent: Thursday, 24 November 2011 4:04 AM
> To: list@lists.pfsense.org
> Subject: [pfSense] Replacing CheckPoint Firewall-1 wi
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Ugo Bellavance wrote:
> We're thinking about replacing our CheckPoint Firewall-1 by pfSense. We
> are using only those features on Firewall-1 (R65):
>
Concerns:
> 3- Backups. Are automated backups (of the config, at least) possible even
> w/o a service contrac
> Hi,
>
> We're thinking about replacing our CheckPoint Firewall-1 by pfSense.
> We
> are using only those features on Firewall-1 (R65):
Based on your requirements, you'll be quite happy with PFSense.
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http:
Hi,
We're thinking about replacing our CheckPoint Firewall-1 by pfSense. We
are using only those features on Firewall-1 (R65):
- Security (default deny on everything)
- NAT (inbound (for internet-facing hosts) and outbound (selective,
workstations go out through a proxy, other selected hosts
