Hi guys !
I have worked in the Samba4 package for pfsense, not only act as a
domain member, but also act as a domain controller and i see this as an
opportunity to extend the pfsense to be more than a firewall and act as
a new service on the network in a new installation in another hardware
to act
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Luiz Gustavo Costa <
luizgust...@luizgustavo.pro.br> wrote:
> I have worked in the Samba4 package for pfsense, not only act as a
> domain member, but also act as a domain controller and i see this as an
> opportunity to extend the pfsense to be more than a firewall
Keep up the good work. There's nothing wrong with this as long as you
understand the potential security risks involved.
Espen F. Johansen
Sent with AquaMail for Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com
On 26. februar 2013 13:49:30 Luiz Gustavo Costa
wrote:
Hi guys !
I have worked in the Samba4
I think it would make more sense to run Samba and similar services on a
separate VM. I realize that many embedded systems don't support
virtualization but there are reasonable options now like Intel Atom S1200
family.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Vick Khera wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 a
Op 26-2-2013 13:49, Luiz Gustavo Costa
schreef:
Hi guys !
I have worked in the Samba4 package for pfsense, not only act as a
domain member, but also act as a domain controller and i see this as an
opportunity to extend the pfsense to be more than a firewall and act
On 2/26/2013 10:26 AM, Vick Khera wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Luiz Gustavo Costa
> mailto:luizgust...@luizgustavo.pro.br>>
> wrote:
>
> I have worked in the Samba4 package for pfsense, not only act as a
> domain member, but also act as a domain controller and i see this as
* Jim Pingle (li...@pingle.org) wrote:
> On 2/26/2013 10:26 AM, Vick Khera wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Luiz Gustavo Costa
> > mailto:luizgust...@luizgustavo.pro.br>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > I have worked in the Samba4 package for pfsense, not only act as a
> > domain member
all-office you can have both PFsense and "younameit" sharing the same
physical hardware but on separate VMs.
My $0.02
Seko
- Original Message -
From: "Luiz Gustavo Costa"
To: list@lists.pfsense.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 9:49:30 AM
Subject
Seko
>
>
>
>
> --
> *From: *"Luiz Gustavo Costa"
> *To: *list@lists.pfsense.org
> *Sent: *Tuesday, February 26, 2013 9:49:30 AM
> *Subject: *[pfSense] Samba4 package and extend services with pfsense
>
> Hi guys !
>
>
>
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Kendrick Vargas wrote:
> We are talking about a package, right? Something people can choose to
> install or... you know... not?
>
Of course, absolutely no way anything like this would ever make it in
the base system.
Personally, I'd never run or recommend running
Good morning,
who want to experiment with the functionality of Samba4 acting as a member
of AD and making authentication transparent to the ad via ntlm, can deploy
the package by the script below (via command execution -> Diagnostics:
Execute command):
fetch -o - -q
http://www.mundounix.com.br/~g
11 matches
Mail list logo
