Makes sense. I was confused, seeing it in the context of analyzing
secure connections to Google subnets. Apparently I'm not "QUIC" enough
on the uptake of the Google's experimental transport layers. :-)
On 8/5/2016 5:41 PM, Jim Pingle wrote:
On 8/5/2016 3:13 PM, Karl Fife wrote:
All of th
On 8/5/2016 3:13 PM, Karl Fife wrote:
> All of the states in the pfsense states display make sense to me:
> e.g. http://www.cs.hofstra.edu/~cscccl/c333/tcp.gif
>
> Maybe I'm having a brain fart, but I'm not finding a good treatise on
> the "multiple:multiple" state?
> Anyone?
That "state" should
All of the states in the pfsense states display make sense to me:
e.g. http://www.cs.hofstra.edu/~cscccl/c333/tcp.gif
Maybe I'm having a brain fart, but I'm not finding a good treatise on
the "multiple:multiple" state?
Anyone?
___
pfSense mailing l
