I have an existing dataase
of saved objects which I wish to add fields to (IE add words:).
I probably only want to add the words if I absolutely must
in order to keep size down. I also may already
have added a particular word to an object instance and dont wish to
overwrite the value already assoc
Rebol Modules have been discussed by Carl Sassenrath. They should cover what
you require, if an 'object! doesn't quite fit what you want. I'm getting a
friend who has got a bigger collection of emails to post it to the list
again or to find which message it was.
Andrew Martin
ICQ: 26227169
http:/
no. The Math/Pie you have created is an instance variable not a static
variable. It is associated with an instance of the class, not the class
itself. A static variable means that there is a single copy of this variable
associated with class itself. You do not need to instantiate a class to use
st
On Sat, 9 Sep 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> As I mentioned above, it is unlikely that mobile handsets will have Rebol
> available baked in to their EPROMs, but UMTS armed PDAs could be equipped
> with Rebol.
>
> What do you think about it?
I think it would be nice with rebol on my newton, it
Rishi wrote:
> Math.pi=20
>> Math: make object! [
[Pie: 20
[]
>> Math/Pie
== 20
>> Pie
** Script Error: Pie has no value.
** Where: Pie
>>
Andrew Martin
ICQ: 26227169
http://members.xoom.com/AndrewMartin/
-><-
Volker wrote:
> 'protect-system 'protect-system 'protect-system ...
Definitely, that too! :-)
Andrew Martin
ICQ: 26227169
http://members.xoom.com/AndrewMartin/
-><-
Hi all,
thanks for your answers! I think for the time being everything is okay with
Rebol, especially when it comes to learning Rebol it's good to have it handy
on all kinds of Intel machines in order to establish a large developer
community. However, I try to find out where the IT market might a
You
might want to look at the definitions for "bind" and "use". Also, look at
the /local refinement by doing HELP FUNCTION.
Paul
Tretter
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2000 2:41
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sub
I've just started to play around with rebol. It
definately has it's =advantages for the beginner progammer but it seems
shows some weakness =for advanced, modular based programming. For example,
all user/system =defined variables are either global (or local to a
function). Since all =variabl
I think rebol would be surprised at how popular
rebol for epoc (psion's OS) would be. OPL, psion's built in, interpreted,
programming language is extremely popular among the psion crowd in europe. There
are lot's of opl programs coming out for psion simply because it is much easier
to progra
>Hi all,
>
>I am amazed by REBOL as a language environmment - it's like a dream has
>become true.
>
>However, I am worried about the fact that there are no ports to PDAs
>available yet,...
I agree with you completely, Eberhard. I'm eager to see an EPOC
porting of REBOL. But... I remember a thre
Is this a network error message generated from REBOL?
** Access Error: Network timeout.
If so, What does it actually mean or what would cause it?
Paul
If a BeIA-based PDA surfaces, then REBOL "may" work by default since BeIA
"is" BeOS.
>However, I am worried about the fact that there are no ports to PDAs
>available yet, not even to the most popular platforms, e.g., Palm and Psion.
>I would like to carry REBOL around with me on a small pocket s
Hi all,
I am amazed by REBOL as a language environmment - it's like a dream has
become true.
However, I am worried about the fact that there are no ports to PDAs
available yet, not even to the most popular platforms, e.g., Palm and Psion.
I would like to carry REBOL around with me on a small poc
Yes... "closing a port" == "killing a connection". That's why you want to
leave it open until you're done with your IRC session.
R.
At 10:18 AM 9/9/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>
> If I open a port to an IRC server doesnt closing the port each time I want
>to send data effectively kill the conn
Sorry, this is the final posting to rebol on the security of ARC4 and cipher-beta.r
Ryan, thought you'd be interested in this piece on key-length and security.
http://theory.lcs.mit.edu/~rivest/bsa-final-report.ascii
If I open a port to an IRC server doesnt closing the port each time I want
to send data effectively kill the connection at the same time?
Paul
Thanks Russ. I am already hard at work on this and getting good results. I
thank you for your help. For anyone that wants to deal with ports this
thread should help everyone.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2000 6:49 A
Regarding the strength of the cipher-beta.r script recently posted: (this will be my last post to the rebol group on this topic, since it is now about encryption and not rebol, future correspondance will be sent directly to you Ryan, if that is ok? I just felt I had to defend the script one more
Paul, "b" is just what comes in from the port. As you can see by the
second line of code, 'b is simply a string. You see it's contents when this
program runs, as all this does is print 'b over and over as the data
arrives. Check out the docs/examples on 'parse... it's very powerful and
exactly
and use "rebol -s" to switch down security, then enfoce them
with 'secure to a nice level.
i use {rebol -s --do "secure [what i like]" script.r} in a start-script.
otherwise it pops "lower security level"..
Volker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 9-Sep-2000/19:48:01+12:00
> > I am writing a non-int
protect-system 'protect-system 'protect-system ..
Volker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 9-Sep-2000/17:38:16+12:00
> princepawn wrote:
> > Oh my god. I think this is the most naive thing I have ever done in my
> life... I really didn't even think that I had just redefined form.
>
> > This is so e
> I am writing a non-interactive script and would like to forego the popup
asking for permission to write on ports.
>
> How might I do this?
>> help secure
USAGE:
SECURE 'level
DESCRIPTION:
Specifies security policies (access levels and directories). Return
prior settings.
SECURE i
I am writing a non-interactive script and would like to forego the popup asking for
permission to write on ports.
How might I do this?
Thanks!
Get your FREE Email and Voicemail at Lycos Communications at
http://comm.lycos.com
24 matches
Mail list logo