[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 25-Oct-1999/17:48:44-8:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >t wrote:
> > [...]
>
> The "console" being talked about is the platform-independent console
> code that now exists in the 2.1.90 beta. It is this platform-independent
> code that allows scripts such as %redit.
Just as I sent my question I read the answer in a message sent yesterday
by "Bo" Lechnowsky...
Good, I got %redit-archive.r, extracted the files, and tried:
>> do %redit.r
Script: "REBOL native editor" (7-Oct-1999)
** Script Error: compose has no value.
** Where: append bounds compose/deep [
exactly!
Thanks, I have now upgraded.
Thanks also to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I will now try to upgrade ofter.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Just as I sent my question I read the answer in a message sent yesterday
> > by "Bo" Lechnowsky...
> >
> > Good, I got %redit-arc
Me Too!
to testing Rebol/View and
to asking where Rebol/Command ???
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, January 03, 2000 6:53 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [REBOL] What's next for REBOL...
I would like to collect the text after the brackets match in number without knowing
how many
brackets there are...
>> text1
== {some words until my-tag < something < some more > still included > to be copied to
rest > this
also}
>> count: 0
== 0
>> parse text1 [copy text2 thru "my-tag" any [thr
Super, exactly what I wanted !!!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> Hi Antonio,
>
> Here's an adaptation of something I dug up out of some old list messages,
> by Stephen Butler:
>
> >> non-brack: complement charset "<>"
> == make bitset! #{
> FFAFFF
Let´s make it $0.04 !
This is not a democracy, but an "open dictatorship" so I´ll throw my Vote (or my
$0.02) together
with this idea:
- keep control
- work on /View or whatever makes more business sense
( or gives the most pleasure... )
- but if anyone is crazy enough to help you support
