>
> Hi!
>
> Just an advice to the REBOL homepage maintainers: Better remove this part of
> the page "http://www.rebol.com/whyrebol.html":
>
> "It flows from the same theory that Einstein proved: everything is relative."
>
> Why? Because it shows a great deal of ignorance.
>
> Sorry about havi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sorry about having that opinion - I'm not a fanatic physicist, but do know
> that the point of Einstein's relativity theory is that the speed of light is
> constant (i.e., /not/ relative), and I'm generally tired of cases of science
You are right, but that implies (in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> ... - I'm not a fanatic physicist, but do know
> that the point of Einstein's relativity theory is that the speed of light is
> constant (i.e., /not/ relative), and I'm generally tired of cases of science
> reduced to some nice-sounding crap.
>
...
>
> Do a
Ole,
Thought we might be pushing beyond the speed-of-hype here.
Hey, the lighter the hype mass, the less energy it takes to accelerate it, right? The
fastest hype is the lightest weight.
I agree with you. So, axed it will be. A brainstorm item, and we don't need it to
push our ideas.
Of c
Hi , 28-Oct-1999 you wrote:
>> Sorry about having that opinion - I'm not a fanatic physicist, but do know
>> that the point of Einstein's relativity theory is that the speed of light
is
>> constant (i.e., /not/ relative), and I'm generally tired of cases of
science
>You are right, but that impli
> BTW, if REBOL Tech. _do_ want to cite Einstein, better make
> it "Everything should be as simple as possible, but not
> simpler". That fits REBOL a lot more, I guess.
Nice quote. That's one of the ones they use on one of the Waba pages:
http://www.wabasoft.com/spec.html. (Waba is a programming
Always been one of my favorites. But, also overused.
-Carl
At 10/28/99 04:42 PM -0400, you wrote:
>> BTW, if REBOL Tech. _do_ want to cite Einstein, better make
>> it "Everything should be as simple as possible, but not
>> simpler". That fits REBOL a lot more, I guess.
>
>Nice quote. That's on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Before this discussion gets out of control (but thanks for enlightening me,
> anyway ;-) ), I'd like to point out that the meaning of my original mail was
> that I really cannot see any equivalence between Einstein's relativity theory
> and REBOL, other than the word "r
tober 28, 1999 5:03 PM
Subject: [REBOL] "Everything is relative"... hmmm... Re:(3)
>> BTW, if REBOL Tech. _do_ want to cite Einstein, better make
>> it "Everything should be as simple as possible, but not
>> simpler". That fits REBOL a lot more, I guess.
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
> On 28-Oct-99, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > relativity theory and REBOL, other than the word "relative". (Besides, as
> > far as I remember, "Relative Expression-Based Object Language" was made up
> > _after_ the name "REBOL" was decided upon...)
>
> I don't
Hi Elliott, 2-Nov-1999 you wrote:
>> relativity theory and REBOL, other than the word "relative". (Besides, as
>> far as I remember, "Relative Expression-Based Object Language" was made up
>> _after_ the name "REBOL" was decided upon...)
>I don't know about this, but I do remember reading about
11 matches
Mail list logo
