At 10:24 PM 12/1/99 +0100, you wrote:
Hi Elan,
my point I wanted to state was: if both 'probe s are the same
you can't use the probe to show that it's not duplicated, am I
right?
Absolutely.
Elan
regards
Ingo
Those were the words of [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Ingo,
yes, you do get the same
Hi Gabriele,
thanks.
At 01:53 PM 12/2/99 +0100, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12:48 PM 12/1/99 +0100, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It uses use
contexts:
To avoid problems with the garbage collector, my hide.r show work
fine here.
Mmm... show = should.
Hi
Hi Ladislav,
you wrote:
We have gained a lot. CF:
no-copying: same? get in a 'message get in b 'message
==true
no-copying: same? get in a/message 'get-num get in b/message 'get-num
==true
I see what you mean. I'd call it a bug ... When objects are inherited,
objects they contain should not be
