[REBOL] One more thing - Odd behavior with setting variables Re:

2000-07-25 Thread agem
[rebol[] paths: ["blah1/" "blah blah2/" ] a: second paths ? a paths: [%blah1/ %"blah blah2/" ] a: second paths ? a ] A is a string of value: "blah blah2/" A is a file of value: %blah%20blah2/ if you use some functions, they may handle strings and files differently. >> exists? %bak == true >>

[REBOL] One more thing - Odd behavior with setting variables Re:

2000-07-25 Thread bhandley
> > > path: ["blah1" "blah2" "blah3" "blah4" "blah5"] > > > > is better written as: > > paths: [%blah1/ %"blah blah2/" ... > > paths: [%blah1/ %"blah blah2/" (i dont get it) > In this case paths is a block. A block groups a number of values. You've shown two values - both represent re

[REBOL] One more thing - Odd behavior with setting variables

2000-07-25 Thread webmaster
At 04:08 AM 7/25/00 -0500, you wrote: >This: > > path: ["blah1" "blah2" "blah3" "blah4" "blah5"] > > is better written as: > paths: [%blah1/ %"blah blah2/" ... paths: [%blah1/ %"blah blah2/" (i dont get it) this makes no sense to me. first there is a % then a space then %" then "