[REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re:(4)

2000-01-21 Thread Michael_Chean
Hi: I want to thank everyone on the list who has contributed to this thread. I realize that its main intent is to communicate to Rebol your preferences, but in the process you've clarified a lot of the issues involved in Web development for this neophyte. I've thought about asking the group abo

[REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re:(4)

2000-01-20 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2000 10:42 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re:(3) > I would really be interested in knowing > how many people interested in Rebol > are *truly* in

[REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re:(4)

2000-01-20 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2000 9:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Re: Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re:(2) > > It is surely platform-independent, as long as you use Windows and > InternetExplorer. >

[REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re:(4)

2000-01-19 Thread nrc
Greetings All, I'm brand new to the list so I'll ask your pardon for my naivete about some subjects you're discussing. However this did my catch my attention... > I would really be interested in knowing > how many people interested in Rebol > are *truly* interested in an alternative > to

[REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re:(4)

2000-01-19 Thread icimjs
Hi Mike, you wrote: >My own preference is to get /COMMAND >as soon as possible. [snipped Thomspon Toolkit (it's still around?)] >especially >reformatting data from many external >sources for import to relational databases. I have been using REBOL/Core for that. Don't need REBOL/Command to re

[REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re:(4)

2000-01-19 Thread Petr . Krenzelok
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > At 08:03 PM 1/19/00 +0100, you wrote: > >Hi Elan, > > > >I choosed to comment on your post, if you don't mind :-) > > No, I don't mind. > > > > >What's missing? Well, if you will look into REBOL system object structure, > you > >will find system/user/words and system/

[REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re:(4)

2000-01-19 Thread icimjs
Hi Ted, you wrote: [IF REBOL/View] >is not going to ship this week as originally promised, what makes you think so? ;- Elan >> [: - )]

[REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re:(4)

2000-01-19 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2000 1:33 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re:(3) > > that the source-code is about 50K to 100K LOC, which is handle able. > > Hmmm.. this is an i